# TaSR-RAG: Taxonomy-guided Structured Reasoning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09341 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.09341/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 10 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)
- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Knowledge-graph and structured-knowledge RAG](https://mlsanity.com/rag/knowledge-graph-and-structured-knowledge-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16130/) (2024)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05366/) (2025)
- [HyperGraphRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Hypergraph-Structured Knowledge Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21322/) (2025)
- [Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09477/) (2025)
- [DynamicRAG: Leveraging Outputs of Large Language Model as Feedback for Dynamic Reranking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07233/) (2025)
- [GRACE: Generative Representation Learning via Contrastive Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04506/) (2025)
- [Structure-R1: Dynamically Leveraging Structural Knowledge in LLM Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15191/) (2025)
- [Rethinking the Reranker: Boundary-Aware Evidence Selection for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03689/) (2026)
- [Hypercube-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Scientific Question-Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19288/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Retrieval is Cheap, Show Me the Code: Executable Multi-Hop Reasoning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12975/) (2026)
- [Accurate, Efficient, and Explainable Deep Learning Approaches for Environmental Science Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19366/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps large language models (LLMs) answer knowledge-intensive and time-sensitive questions by conditioning generation on external evidence. However, most RAG systems still retrieve unstructured chunks and rely on one-shot generation, which often yields redundant context, low information density, and brittle multi-hop reasoning. While structured RAG pipelines can improve grounding, they typically require costly and error-prone graph construction or impose rigid entity-centric structures that do not align with the query's reasoning chain. We propose textscTaSR-RAG, a taxonomy-guided structured reasoning framework for evidence selection. We represent both queries and documents as relational triples, and constrain entity semantics with a lightweight two-level taxonomy to balance generalization and precision. Given a complex question, textscTaSR-RAG decomposes it into an ordered sequence of triple sub-queries with explicit latent variables, then performs step-wise evidence selection via hybrid triple matching that combines semantic similarity over raw triples with structural consistency over typed triples. By maintaining an explicit entity binding table across steps, textscTaSR-RAG resolves intermediate variables and reduces entity conflation without explicit graph construction or exhaustive search. Experiments on multiple multi-hop question answering benchmarks show that textscTaSR-RAG consistently outperforms strong RAG and structured-RAG baselines by up to 14%, while producing clearer evidence attribution and more faithful reasoning traces.