# Evidence-Driven Reasoning for Industrial Maintenance Using Heterogeneous Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08171 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08171/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 8 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19678/) (2025)
- [AssetOpsBench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Task Automation in Industrial Asset Operations and Maintenance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03828/) (2025)
- [Causal Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (CTGCN)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09634/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Beyond Static Leaderboards: Predictive Validity for the Evaluation of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19704/) (2026)
- [When LLMs Sit Above Diagnostic Tools: Unrealized Complementarity in Industrial Fault Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05031/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Industrial maintenance platforms contain rich but fragmented evidence, including free-text work orders, heterogeneous operational sensors or indicators, and structured failure knowledge. These sources are often analyzed in isolation, producing alerts or forecasts that do not support conditional decision-making: given this asset history and behavior, what is happening and what action is warranted? We present Condition Insight Agent, a deployed decision-support framework that integrates maintenance language, behavioral abstractions of operational data, and engineering failure semantics to produce evidence-grounded explanations and advisory actions. The system constrains reasoning through deterministic evidence construction and structured failure knowledge, and applies a rule-based verification loop to suppress unsupported conclusions. Case studies from production CMMS deployments show that this verification-first design operates reliably under heterogeneous and incomplete data while preserving human oversight. Our results demonstrate how constrained LLM-based reasoning can function as a governed decision-support layer for industrial maintenance.