# VIVECaption: A Split Approach to Caption Quality Improvement

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07401 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07401/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12242/) (2022)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Grounded Language-Image Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03857/) (2021)
- [NoLiMa: Long-Context Evaluation Beyond Literal Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05167/) (2025)
- [Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07192/) (2025)
- [Investigating Prompting Techniques for Zero- and Few-Shot Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09996/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Caption quality has emerged as a critical bottleneck in training high-quality text-to-image (T2I) and text-to-video (T2V) generative models. While visual language models (VLMs) are commonly deployed to generate captions from visual data, they suffer from hallucinations, poor compositional reasoning, and limited fine-grained understanding, resulting in misaligned image-caption pairs that degrade downstream model performance. This technical report introduces VIVECaption, a systematic two-sided approach to caption quality improvement. We first establish a comprehensive taxonomy of caption evaluation metrics, distinguishing between "universal" and "instance-grounded" metrics, with the ultimate goal of showcasing the use-cases and tradeoffs between different caption quality metrics. We then use this language to describe our two-sided approach to caption quality improvement: (1) a gold-standard dataset creation methodology using stratified sampling and (2) a model alignment strategy encompassing context alignment and parameter-level finetuning using SFT. We demonstrate our methodology on open-source models, focusing on structured caption formats that enable better parsing and downstream utilization. We ultimately show that using a finetuned character detection model in an image captioning pipeline significantly improves holistic image-caption alignment quality. Our work addresses the growing need for high-quality "vegan" training data in enterprise AI development, providing practical solutions for teams seeking to improve caption-image alignment without relying on potentially copyright-protected web-scraped content.