# Synthetic Monitoring Environments for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06252 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06252/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 10 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Deep RL algorithms and representations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/deep-rl-algorithms-and-representations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.01852/) (2015)
- [Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.5602/) (2013)
- [Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09477/) (2018)
- [Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08265/) (2019)
- [On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08734/) (2018)
- [Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.01815/) (2017)
- [Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01588/) (2019)
- [Behaviour Suite for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03568/) (2019)
- [Robust Gymnasium: A Unified Modular Benchmark for Robust Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19652/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) lacks benchmarks that enable precise, white-box diagnostics of agent behavior. Current environments often entangle complexity factors and lack ground-truth optimality metrics, making it difficult to isolate why algorithms fail. We introduce Synthetic Monitoring Environments (SMEs), an infinite suite of continuous control tasks. SMEs provide fully configurable task characteristics and known optimal policies. As such, SMEs allow for the exact calculation of instantaneous regret. Their rigorous geometric state space bounds allow for systematic within-distribution (WD) and out-of-distribution (OOD) evaluation. We demonstrate the framework's benefit through multidimensional ablations of PPO, TD3, and SAC, revealing how specific environmental properties - such as action or state space size, reward sparsity and complexity of the optimal policy - impact WD and OOD performance. We thereby show that SMEs offer a standardized, transparent testbed for transitioning RL evaluation from empirical benchmarking toward rigorous scientific analysis.