# Real-Time AI Service Economy: A Framework for Agentic Computing Across the Continuum

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05614 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05614/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 7 of its 69 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [Agents of Chaos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20021/) (2026)
- [Agentic AI Frameworks: Architectures, Protocols, and Design Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10146/) (2025)
- [Autonomy and Intelligence in the Computing Continuum: Challenges, Enablers, and Future Directions for Orchestration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01423/) (2022)
- [Agentic Services Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24380/) (2025)
- [Service Orchestration in the Computing Continuum: Structural Challenges and Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15794/) (2026)
- [Socio-technical aspects of Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06064/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Neural Router: Semantic Content Matching for Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25701/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous AI agents are becoming economic actors. They compose deadline-bound services across the device-edge-cloud continuum and contend for capacity no single operator owns. This article asks when decentralised pricing can coordinate them exactly and truthfully, and what their service dependencies must satisfy. We model the pipelines as service-dependency graphs under governance constraints and identify the decisive property: laminarity of the induced leaf-block family. Where it holds, the feasible allocation space is a polymatroid and efficient incentive-compatible clearing exists per epoch; where a crossing breaks it, exactness and truthfulness can fail, while clearing prices survive on every totally unimodular family. The formal results instantiate polymatroid, gross-substitutes and Vickrey-Clarke-Groves theory; the contribution is the bridge from dependency structure to that machinery and an integrator architecture that exposes a laminar interface. The node-level evaluation (32,020 runs), at testbed-calibrated congestion, locates the boundary. One crossing costs exactness in 14.7% of high-load rounds and none on laminar instances, and truthfulness fails where exactness does, across contention. An integrator's inner exposure restores exactness at a cost in admitted volume, and before translation overhead it cuts median latency by 16 to 17 percent. Against truth-free posted prices the tuned market leads at medium load and trails a demand-responsive one in four of six high-load cells. Recorded and composed agent workloads drive the allocation. For platform designers, laminar pipelines admit exact decentralised pricing, truthful under the VCG mechanism, and a crossing needs an integrator's inner exposure.