# Lightweight Visual Reasoning for Socially-Aware Robots

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03942 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03942/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10592/) (2023)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [CogVLM: Visual Expert for Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03079/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23661/) (2025)
- [LlamaV-o1: Rethinking Step-by-step Visual Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06186/) (2025)
- [Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16198/) (2024)
- [Draw-and-Understand: Leveraging Visual Prompts to Enable MLLMs to Comprehend What You Want](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20271/) (2024)
- [Mementos: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning over Image Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10529/) (2024)
- [Image-of-Thought Prompting for Visual Reasoning Refinement in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13872/) (2024)
- [CoCoT: Contrastive Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Multimodal Models with Multiple Image Inputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02582/) (2024)
- [A Survey of State of the Art Large Vision Language Models: Alignment, Benchmark, Evaluations and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02189/) (2025)
- [Joint Visual and Text Prompting for Improved Object-Centric Perception with Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04514/) (2024)
- [MMRo: Are Multimodal LLMs Eligible as the Brain for In-Home Robotics?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19693/) (2024)
- [Autonomous Imagination: Closed-Loop Decomposition of Visual-to-Textual Conversion in Visual Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.18142/) (2024)
- [Agreeing to Interact in Human-Robot Interaction using Large Language Models and Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15491/) (2025)
- [A Navigation Framework Utilizing Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10172/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Robots operating in shared human environments must not only navigate, interact, and detect their surroundings, they must also interpret and respond to dynamic, and often unpredictable, human behaviours. Although recent advances have shown promise in enhancing robotic perception and instruction-following using Vision-Language Models (VLMs), they remain limited in addressing the complexities of multimodal human-robot interactions (HRI). Motivated by this challenge, we introduce a lightweight language-to-vision feedback module that closes the loop between an LLM and the vision encoder in VLMs. The module projects image-token hidden states through a gated Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) back into the encoder input, prompting a second pass that reinterprets the scene under text context. We evaluate this approach on three robotics-centred tasks: navigation in a simulated environment (Habitat), sequential scene description (Mementos-Robotics), and human-intention recognition (our HRI dataset). Results show that our method improves Qwen 2.5 (7B) by 3.3% (less distance), +0.057 description score, and +2.93% accuracy, with less than 3% extra parameters; Gemma 3 (4B) and LLaVA OV 1.5 (4B) show mixed navigation results but gains +0.111,+0.055 and +10.81%,+4.79% on the latter two tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/alessioGalatolo/VLM-Reasoning-for-Robotics