# The CompMath-MCQ Dataset: Are LLMs Ready for Higher-Level Math?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03334 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03334/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 22 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Mathematical reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/mathematical-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00110/) (2021)
- [We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01284/) (2024)
- [Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07985/) (2024)
- [TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12524/) (2023)
- [Orca-Math: Unlocking the potential of SLMs in Grade School Math](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14830/) (2024)
- [MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02884/) (2024)
- [Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21380/) (2025)
- [Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19411/) (2025)
- [HARDMath: A Benchmark Dataset for Challenging Problems in Applied Mathematics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09988/) (2024)
- [Leveraging Online Olympiad-Level Math Problems for LLMs Training and Contamination-Resistant Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14275/) (2025)
- [Uni-MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Unified Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13759/) (2025)
- [HARP: A challenging human-annotated math reasoning benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08819/) (2024)
- [U-MATH: A University-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Skills in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03205/) (2024)
- [StatEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Large Language Models in Statistics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09517/) (2025)
- [MathMist: A Parallel Multilingual Benchmark Dataset for Mathematical Problem Solving and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14305/) (2025)
- [Exploiting Primacy Effect To Improve Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13949/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on mathematical reasoning has largely focused on elementary problems, competition-style questions, or formal theorem proving, leaving graduate-level and computational mathematics relatively underexplored. We introduce CompMath-MCQ, a new benchmark dataset for assessing LLMs on advanced mathematical reasoning in a multiple-choice setting. The dataset consists of 1{,}500 originally authored questions by professors of graduate-level courses, covering topics including Linear Algebra, Numerical Optimization, Vector Calculus, Probability, and Python-based scientific computing. Three option choices are provided for each question, with exactly one of them being correct. To ensure the absence of data leakage, all questions are newly created and not sourced from existing materials. The validity of questions is verified through a procedure based on cross-LLM disagreement, followed by manual expert review. By adopting a multiple-choice format, our dataset enables objective, reproducible, and bias-free evaluation through lm_eval library. Baseline results with state-of-the-art LLMs indicate that advanced computational mathematical reasoning remains a significant challenge. We release CompMath-MCQ at the following link: https://github.com/biancaraimondi/CompMath-MCQ.git