# From Language to Action: Can LLM-Based Agents Be Used for Embodied Robot Cognition?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03148 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03148/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16291/) (2023)
- [Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12213/) (2024)
- [AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00978/) (2023)
- [Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07753/) (2022)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [MineDojo: Building Open-Ended Embodied Agents with Internet-Scale Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08853/) (2022)
- [AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10468/) (2025)
- [Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07166/) (2024)
- [Instruct2Act: Mapping Multi-modality Instructions to Robotic Actions with Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11176/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models for Robotics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04334/) (2024)
- [Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15840/) (2025)
- [LLM With Tools: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18807/) (2024)
- [Generative to Agentic AI: Survey, Conceptualization, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18875/) (2025)
- [ROS-LLM: A ROS framework for embodied AI with task feedback and structured reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19741/) (2024)
- [Investigating Agency of LLMs in Human-AI Collaboration Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12815/) (2023)
- [KALIE: Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Open-World Manipulation without Robot Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14066/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20683/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In order to flexibly act in an everyday environment, a robotic agent needs a variety of cognitive capabilities that enable it to reason about plans and perform execution recovery. Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to demonstrate emergent cognitive aspects, such as reasoning and language understanding; however, the ability to control embodied robotic agents requires reliably bridging high-level language to low-level functionalities for perception and control. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which an LLM can serve as a core component for planning and execution reasoning in a cognitive robot architecture. For this purpose, we propose a cognitive architecture in which an agentic LLM serves as the core component for planning and reasoning, while components for working and episodic memories support learning from experience and adaptation. An instance of the architecture is then used to control a mobile manipulator in a simulated household environment, where environment interaction is done through a set of high-level tools for perception, reasoning, navigation, grasping, and placement, all of which are made available to the LLM-based agent. We evaluate our proposed system on two household tasks (object placement and object swapping), which evaluate the agent's reasoning, planning, and memory utilisation. The results demonstrate that the LLM-driven agent can complete structured tasks and exhibits emergent adaptation and memory-guided planning, but also reveal significant limitations, such as hallucinations about the task success and poor instruction following by refusing to acknowledge and complete sequential tasks. These findings highlight both the potential and challenges of employing LLMs as embodied cognitive controllers for autonomous robots.