# Agentic Mixed-Source Multi-Modal Misinformation Detection with Adaptive Test-Time Scaling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02519 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02519/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-jailbreaks-and-adversarial-robustness/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01680/) (2024)
- [Qwen3-VL-Embedding and Qwen3-VL-Reranker: A Unified Framework for State-of-the-Art Multimodal Retrieval and Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04720/) (2026)
- [A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24235/) (2025)
- [Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01352/) (2025)
- [TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20138/) (2024)
- [PatchCraft: Exploring Texture Patch for Efficient AI-generated Image Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12397/) (2023)
- [Agentic Large Language Models, a survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23037/) (2025)
- [Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07324/) (2024)
- [MMFakeBench: A Mixed-Source Multimodal Misinformation Detection Benchmark for LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08772/) (2024)
- [Rewarding Chatbots for Real-World Engagement with Millions of Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06135/) (2023)
- [METAL: A Multi-Agent Framework for Chart Generation with Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17651/) (2025)
- [WebGym: Scaling Training Environments for Visual Web Agents with Realistic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02439/) (2026)
- [Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04616/) (2024)
- [A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.13907/) (2020)
- [Debunk and Infer: Multimodal Fake News Detection via Diffusion-Generated Evidence and LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21557/) (2025)
- [FineFake: A Knowledge-Enriched Dataset for Fine-Grained Multi-Domain Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01336/) (2024)
- [T^2Agent A Tool-augmented Multimodal Misinformation Detection Agent with Monte Carlo Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19768/) (2025)
- [PAMAS: Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent System with Perspective Aggregation for Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03158/) (2026)
- [Towards Propagation-aware Representation Learning for Supervised Social Media Graph Analytics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01124/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) have been proven effective for detecting multi-modal misinformation on social platforms, especially in zero-shot settings with unavailable or delayed annotations. However, a single VLM's capacity falls short in the more complex mixed-source multi-modal misinformation detection (M3D) task. Taking captioned images as an example, in M3D, false information can originate from untruthful texts, forged images, or mismatches between the two modalities. Although recent agentic systems can handle zero-shot M3D by connecting modality-specific VLM agents, their effectiveness is still bottlenecked by their architecture. In existing agentic M3D solutions, for any input sample, each agent performs only one forward reasoning pass, making decisions prone to model randomness and reasoning errors in challenging cases. Moreover, the lack of exploration over alternative reasoning paths prevents modern VLMs from fully utilizing their reasoning capacity. In this work, we present AgentM3D, a multi-agent framework for zero-shot M3D. To amplify the reasoning capability of VLMs, we introduce an adaptive test-time scaling paradigm in which each modality-specific VLM agent applies a Best-of-N mechanism, coupled with a critic agent for task-aligned scoring. The agents are organized in a cascading, modality-specific decision chain to reduce unnecessary computation and limit error propagation. To ensure scalability, a planning agent dynamically determines the maximum number of reasoning paths based on sample difficulty, and an adaptive stopping mechanism prevents excessive reasoning within each agent. Extensive experiments on two M3D benchmarks demonstrate that AgentM3D achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot detection performance compared with various VLM-based and agentic baselines.