# Learning to Pay Attention: Unsupervised Modeling of Attentive and Inattentive Respondents in Survey Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02427 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02427/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 3 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Unsupervised Anomaly Detection via Variational Auto-Encoder for Seasonal KPIs in Web Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03903/) (2018)
- [Robust Variational Autoencoders for Outlier Detection and Repair of Mixed-Type Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06671/) (2019)
- [When Respondents Don't Care Anymore: Identifying the Onset of Careless Responding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07167/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The integrity of behavioral and social-science surveys depends on detecting inattentive respondents who provide random or low-effort answers. Traditional safeguards, such as attention checks, are often costly, reactive, and inconsistent. We propose a unified, label-free framework for inattentiveness detection that scores response coherence using complementary unsupervised views: geometric reconstruction (Autoencoders) and probabilistic dependency modeling (Chow-Liu trees). While we introduce a "Percentile Loss" objective to improve Autoencoder robustness against anomalies, our primary contribution is identifying the structural conditions that enable unsupervised quality control. Across nine heterogeneous real-world datasets, we find that detection effectiveness is driven less by model complexity than by survey structure: instruments with coherent, overlapping item batteries exhibit strong covariance patterns that allow even linear models to reliably separate attentive from inattentive respondents. This reveals a critical ``Psychometric-ML Alignment'': the same design principles that maximize measurement reliability (e.g., internal consistency) also maximize algorithmic detectability. The framework provides survey platforms with a scalable, domain-agnostic diagnostic tool that links data quality directly to instrument design, enabling auditing without additional respondent burden.