# AgilePruner: An Empirical Study of Attention and Diversity for Adaptive Visual Token Pruning in Large Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01236 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01236/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 26 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Visual token pruning and efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/visual-token-pruning-and-efficiency/)
- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [Visual token pruning in multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/inference/visual-token-pruning-in-multimodal-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14135/) (2022)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12261/) (2019)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14786/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13549/) (2023)
- [VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08218/) (2018)
- [An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06764/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15388/) (2024)
- [InternLM2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17297/) (2024)
- [SparseVLM: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04417/) (2024)
- [VisionZip: Longer is Better but Not Necessary in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04467/) (2024)
- [PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17247/) (2024)
- [DivPrune: Diversity-based Visual Token Pruning for Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02175/) (2025)
- [Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01818/) (2024)
- [ATP-LLaVA: Adaptive Token Pruning for Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00447/) (2024)
- [Beyond Attentive Tokens: Incorporating Token Importance and Diversity for Efficient Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11315/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [ERA: Entropy-Guided Visual Token Pruning with Rectified Attention for Efficient MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31982/) (2026)
- [DiffPrune: differentiable information throttling for token pruning in vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01985/) (2026)
- [SAGE: Training-Free Semantic Evidence Composition for Edge-Cloud Inference under Hard Uplink Budgets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19623/) (2026)
- [Are All Tokens Necessary for Visual Place Recognition? An Empirical Study of Token Reduction for Efficient Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.15563/) (2026)
- [Structured Redundancy Modeling for Efficient Visual Token Pruning in High-Resolution MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.23046/) (2026)
- [3DZip: Spatial-Aware Feature Diversity-Guided Token Compression for 3D Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01185/) (2026)
- [ACPruner: Visual Token Pruning as Biased Attention Coverage Maximization in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34558/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have adopted visual token pruning strategies to mitigate substantial computational overhead incurred by extensive visual token sequences. While prior works primarily focus on either attention-based or diversity-based pruning methods, in-depth analysis of these approaches' characteristics and limitations remains largely unexplored. In this work, we conduct thorough empirical analysis using effective rank (erank) as a measure of feature diversity and attention score entropy to investigate visual token processing mechanisms and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Our analysis reveals two insights: (1) Our erank-based quantitative analysis shows that many diversity-oriented pruning methods preserve substantially less feature diversity than intended; moreover, analysis using the CHAIR dataset reveals that the diversity they do retain is closely tied to increased hallucination frequency compared to attention-based pruning. (2) We further observe that attention-based approaches are more effective on simple images where visual evidence is concentrated, while diversity-based methods better handle complex images with distributed features. Building on these empirical insights, we show that incorporating image-aware adjustments into existing hybrid pruning strategies consistently improves their performance. We also provide a minimal instantiation of our empirical findings through a simple adaptive pruning mechanism, which achieves strong and reliable performance across standard benchmarks as well as hallucination-specific evaluations. Our project page available at https://cvsp-lab.github.io/AgilePruner.