# Learn Hard Problems During RL with Reference Guided Fine-tuning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01223 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01223/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10947/) (2025)
- [ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24864/) (2025)
- [Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07527/) (2025)
- [The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14843/) (2025)
- [SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19767/) (2025)
- [On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07783/) (2025)
- [BREAD: Branched Rollouts from Expert Anchors Bridge SFT & RL for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17211/) (2025)
- [QuestA: Expanding Reasoning Capacity in LLMs via Question Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13266/) (2025)
- [Depth-Breadth Synergy in RLVR: Unlocking LLM Reasoning Gains with Adaptive Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13755/) (2025)
- [Nudging the Boundaries of LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25666/) (2025)
- [Knapsack RL: Unlocking Exploration of LLMs via Optimizing Budget Allocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25849/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning Teachers of Test Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08388/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Beyond GRPO and On-Policy Distillation: An Empirical Sparse-to-Dense Reward Principle for Language-Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12483/) (2026)
- [Learning Agentic Policy from Action Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12004/) (2026)
- [FailForge: Distilling Procedural Competence from Persistent Failures into Code Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.08570/) (2026)
- [What Should a Self-Teacher See? Privileged Context Design for On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25623/) (2026)
- [Mechanistically Interpreting the Role of Sample Difficulty in RLVR for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28388/) (2026)
- [Learning to Solve Hard Problems in RL for LLMs by Never Giving Up](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.13443/) (2026)
- [Hide to Guide: Learning via Semantic Masking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25198/) (2026)
- [OptiAgent: End-to-End Optimization Modeling via Multi-Agent Iterative Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05346/) (2026)
- [MInTRL: Off-policy Intervention can boost On-policy RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12419/) (2026)
- [ReDraft, Don't Just Distill: Reference-Driven Revision for Continual VLLM Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16639/) (2026)
- [WeightBridge: An Efficient Weight Transfer Library for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25442/) (2026)
- [Match the Canvas, Not Just the Answer: Predictability-Aware SFT for Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18001/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) for mathematical reasoning can suffer from reward sparsity: for challenging problems, LLM fails to sample any correct trajectories, preventing RL from receiving meaningful positive feedback. At the same time, there often exist human-written reference solutions along with the problem (e.g., problems from AoPS), but directly fine-tuning on these solutions offers no benefit because models often cannot imitate human proofs that lie outside their own reasoning distribution. We introduce Reference-Guided Fine-Tuning (ReGFT), a simple and effective method that utilizes human-written reference solutions to synthesize positive trajectories on hard problems and train on them before RL. For each problem, we provide the model with a partial reference solution and let it generate its own reasoning trace, ensuring the resulting trajectories remain in the model's reasoning space while still benefiting from reference guidance. Fine-tuning on these reference-guided trajectories increases the number of solvable problems and produces a checkpoint that receives more positive rewards during RL. Across three benchmarks (AIME24, AIME25, BeyondAIME), ReGFT consistently improves supervised accuracy, accelerates DAPO training, and raises the final performance plateau of RL. Our results show that ReGFT effectively overcomes reward sparsity and unlocks stronger RL-based mathematical reasoning.