# Deep Learning-Based Meat Freshness Detection with Segmentation and OOD-Aware Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00368 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00368/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 65 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12877/) (2020)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02136/) (2016)
- [Searching for MobileNetV3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02244/) (2019)
- [Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02690/) (2017)
- [Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03759/) (2020)
- [Transformers in Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.01169/) (2021)
- [Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.08974/) (2018)
- [On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04884/) (2020)
- [Simple Does It: Weakly Supervised Instance and Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.07485/) (2016)
- [Weakly- and Semi-Supervised Learning of a DCNN for Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.02734/) (2015)
- [Do We Train on Test Data? Purging CIFAR of Near-Duplicates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00423/) (2019)
- [Nested cross-validation when selecting classifiers is overzealous for most practical applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09446/) (2018)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Image-Based Food Recognition and Volume Estimation Methods for Dietary Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11776/) (2021)
- [Data Leakage in Visual Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17416/) (2025)
- [Meat Freshness Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00986/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we present a meat freshness classification framework from Red-Green-Blue (RGB) images that supports both packaged and unpackaged meat datasets. The system classifies four in-distribution (ID) meat classes and uses an out-of-distribution (OOD)-aware abstention mechanism that flags low-confidence samples as No Result. The pipeline combines U-Net-based segmentation with deep feature classifiers. Segmentation is used as a preprocessing step to isolate the meat region and reduce background, producing more consistent inputs for classification. The segmentation module achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 75% and a Dice coefficient of 82%, producing standardized inputs for the classification stage. For classification, we benchmark five backbones: Residual Network-50 (ResNet-50), Vision Transformer-Base/16 (ViT-B/16), Swin Transformer-Tiny (Swin-T), EfficientNet-B0, and MobileNetV3-Small. We use nested 5x3 cross-validation (CV) for model selection and hyperparameter tuning. On the held-out ID test set, EfficientNet-B0 achieves the highest accuracy (98.10%), followed by ResNet-50 and MobileNetV3-Small (both 97.63%) and Swin-T (97.51%), while ViT-B/16 is lower (94.42%). We additionally evaluate OOD scoring and thresholding using standard OOD metrics and sensitivity analysis over the abstention threshold. Finally, we report on-device latency using TensorFlow Lite (TFLite) on a smartphone, highlighting practical accuracy-latency trade-offs for future deployment.