# Recursive Belief Vision Language Action Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20659 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20659/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning and chain-of-thought in VLA, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models.
- Builds on 35 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models / [Reasoning and chain-of-thought in VLA](https://mlsanity.com/vla/reasoning-and-chain-of-thought-in-vla/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06817/) (2022)
- [π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16054/) (2025)
- [GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14734/) (2025)
- [Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19645/) (2025)
- [CoT-VLA: Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22020/) (2025)
- [WorldVLA: Towards Autoregressive Action World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21539/) (2025)
- [Robotic Control via Embodied Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08693/) (2024)
- [ThinkAct: Vision-Language-Action Reasoning via Reinforced Visual Latent Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16815/) (2025)
- [TransDreamer: Reinforcement Learning with Transformer World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09481/) (2022)
- [RoboBrain: A Unified Brain Model for Robotic Manipulation from Abstract to Concrete](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21257/) (2025)
- [EfficientVLA: Training-Free Acceleration and Compression for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10100/) (2025)
- [PD-VLA: Accelerating Vision-Language-Action Model Integrated with Action Chunking via Parallel Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02310/) (2025)
- [F1: A Vision-Language-Action Model Bridging Understanding and Generation to Actions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06951/) (2025)
- [FastVLM: Efficient Vision Encoding for Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13303/) (2024)
- [RynnVLA-002: A Unified Vision-Language-Action and World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.17502/) (2025)
- [VL-JEPA: Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture for Vision-language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10942/) (2025)
- [VAGEN: Reinforcing World Model Reasoning for Multi-Turn VLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16907/) (2025)
- [Long-VLA: Unleashing Long-Horizon Capability of Vision Language Action Model for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19958/) (2025)
- [HAMLET: Switch your Vision-Language-Action Model into a History-Aware Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00695/) (2025)
- [Reflective Planning: Vision-Language Models for Multi-Stage Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16707/) (2025)
- [VLA-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01623/) (2025)
- [ContextVLA: Vision-Language-Action Model with Amortized Multi-Frame Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04246/) (2025)
- [HiF-VLA: Hindsight, Insight and Foresight through Motion Representation for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09928/) (2025)
- [CoA-VLA: Improving Vision-Language-Action Models via Visual-Textual Chain-of-Affordance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20451/) (2024)
- [LoHoVLA: A Unified Vision-Language-Action Model for Long-Horizon Embodied Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00411/) (2025)
- [AVA-VLA: Improving Vision-Language-Action models with Active Visual Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18960/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [μVLA: On Recurrent Memory for Partially Observable Manipulation in VLA Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12497/) (2026)
- [Silent Failures in Physical AI: A Literature Review of Runtime Action Authorization for Autonomous Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00090/) (2026)
- [Divide-and-Remember: Recursive Action-Relevant Memory for Long-Horizon VLA Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00982/) (2026)
- [In-Context Learning Can Help Vision-Language Models Overcome Training Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12942/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language-action models must enable agents to execute long-horizon tasks under partial observability. However, most existing approaches remain observation-driven, relying on short context windows or repeated queries to vision-language models (VLMs). This leads to loss of task progress, action repetition under perceptual aliasing, and high inference latency. While semantic grounding is important, long-horizon manipulation fundamentally requires persistent, action-conditioned state representations. Current VLAs lack such representations and exhibit limited temporal and physical reasoning, making them ill-suited for multi-stage control. This paper introduces RB-VLA, a belief-centric architecture trained with self-supervised world-model objectives that maintains a compact latent state encoding task-relevant history, dynamics, and object interactions. Queried once per task, the VLM provides high-level intent, while the belief tracks task progress and enables phase-aware, causally grounded control under partial observability without storing raw observations or scaling memory with time. The belief and intent jointly condition a diffusion policy for robust closed-loop execution. RB-VLA outperforms prior VLAs on long-horizon benchmarks, achieving 52.5 percent and 37.5 percent higher success rates on multi-stage pick-and-place and stacking tasks, respectively, compared to pi_0. It also reduces inference latency by up to five times relative to baselines and eliminates memory growth across timesteps observed in existing VLAs. Ablations show the belief module is the primary driver of performance, increasing success rates from 32.5 percent without belief to 77.5 percent with belief.