# TRUE: A Trustworthy Unified Explanation Framework for Large Language Model Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18905 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.18905/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 33 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13702/) (2023)
- [Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04091/) (2023)
- [Larger language models do in-context learning differently](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03846/) (2023)
- [CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03065/) (2024)
- [Language Models of Code are Few-Shot Commonsense Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07128/) (2022)
- [Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13950/) (2024)
- [Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04614/) (2024)
- [Context-faithful Prompting for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11315/) (2023)
- [Measuring Chain of Thought Faithfulness by Unlearning Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14829/) (2025)
- [TokenSHAP: Interpreting Large Language Models with Monte Carlo Shapley Value Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10114/) (2024)
- [Understanding In-Context Learning via Supportive Pretraining Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15091/) (2023)
- [MMLU-CF: A Contamination-free Multi-task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15194/) (2024)
- [Competition of Mechanisms: Tracing How Language Models Handle Facts and Counterfactuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11655/) (2024)
- [AttriBoT: A Bag of Tricks for Efficiently Approximating Leave-One-Out Context Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15102/) (2024)
- [SelfCite: Self-Supervised Alignment for Context Attribution in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09604/) (2025)
- [TokenShapley: Token Level Context Attribution with Shapley Value](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05261/) (2025)
- [Reasoning-Grounded Natural Language Explanations for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11248/) (2025)
- [Noiser: Bounded Input Perturbations for Attributing Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02911/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, yet their decision-making processes remain difficult to interpret. Existing explanation methods often lack trustworthy structural insight and are limited to single-instance analysis, failing to reveal reasoning stability and systematic failure mechanisms. To address these limitations, we propose the Trustworthy Unified Explanation Framework (TRUE), which integrates executable reasoning verification, feasible-region directed acyclic graph (DAG) modeling, and causal failure mode analysis. At the instance level, we redefine reasoning traces as executable process specifications and introduce blind execution verification to assess operational validity. At the local structural level, we construct feasible-region DAGs via structure-consistent perturbations, enabling explicit characterization of reasoning stability and the executable region in the local input space. At the class level, we introduce a causal failure mode analysis method that identifies recurring structural failure patterns and quantifies their causal influence using Shapley values. Extensive experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed framework provides multi-level, verifiable explanations, including executable reasoning structures for individual instances, feasible-region representations for neighboring inputs, and interpretable failure modes with quantified importance at the class level. These results establish a unified and principled paradigm for improving the interpretability and reliability of LLM reasoning systems.