# Evaluating Graphical Perception Capabilities of Vision Transformers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18178 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.18178/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 98 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01497/) (2015)
- [Mask R-CNN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06870/) (2017)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [Layer Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06450/) (2016)
- [You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02640/) (2015)
- [Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12877/) (2020)
- [Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08415/) (2016)
- [Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.02611/) (2018)
- [Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12122/) (2021)
- [CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15808/) (2021)
- [PaLI-X: On Scaling up a Multilingual Vision and Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18565/) (2023)
- [ChartLlama: A Multimodal LLM for Chart Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16483/) (2023)
- [DePlot: One-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10505/) (2022)
- [UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14761/) (2023)
- [Unifying Vision, Text, and Layout for Universal Document Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.02623/) (2022)
- [MatCha: Enhancing Visual Language Pretraining with Math Reasoning and Chart Derendering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09662/) (2022)
- [Structured Receptive Fields in CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.02971/) (2016)
- [A Survey on ML4VIS: Applying Machine Learning Advances to Data Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.00467/) (2020)
- [ChartReader: A Unified Framework for Chart Derendering and Comprehension without Heuristic Rules](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02173/) (2023)
- [Chart-based Reasoning: Transferring Capabilities from LLMs to VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12596/) (2024)
- [Probing the Visualization Literacy of Vision Language Models: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05445/) (2025)
- [ChartStory: Automated Partitioning, Layout, and Captioning of Charts into Comic-Style Narratives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03996/) (2021)
- [Reverse-engineering Bar Charts Using Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02491/) (2020)
- [ChartDETR: A Multi-shape Detection Network for Visual Chart Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07743/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Can a Neural Encoding Model Replicate an fMRI Visualization Study?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15685/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Transformers, ViTs, have emerged as a powerful alternative to convolutional neural networks, CNNs, in a variety of image-based tasks. While CNNs have previously been evaluated for their ability to perform graphical perception tasks, which are essential for interpreting visualizations, the perceptual capabilities of ViTs remain largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate the performance of ViTs in elementary visual judgment tasks inspired by the foundational studies of Cleveland and McGill, which quantified the accuracy of human perception across different visual encodings. Inspired by their study, we benchmark ViTs against CNNs and human participants in a series of controlled graphical perception tasks. Our results reveal that, although ViTs demonstrate strong performance in general vision tasks, their alignment with human-like graphical perception in the visualization domain is limited. This study highlights key perceptual gaps and points to important considerations for the application of ViTs in visualization systems and graphical perceptual modeling.