# On the Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs for Simple Visual Planning Tasks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15460 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15460/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06769/) (2024)
- [Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06749/) (2025)
- [GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05229/) (2024)
- [Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09567/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10071/) (2022)
- [The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06941/) (2025)
- [Sequential Modeling Enables Scalable Learning for Large Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00785/) (2023)
- [Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07542/) (2025)
- [Machine Mental Imagery: Empower Multimodal Reasoning with Latent Visual Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17218/) (2025)
- [ANOLE: An Open, Autoregressive, Native Large Multimodal Models for Interleaved Image-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06135/) (2024)
- [Chain of Thoughtlessness? An Analysis of CoT in Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04776/) (2024)
- [Visual Planning: Let's Think Only with Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11409/) (2025)
- [Reasoning by Superposition: A Theoretical Perspective on Chain of Continuous Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12514/) (2025)
- [VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01863/) (2024)
- [Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01191/) (2025)
- [When Visualizing is the First Step to Reasoning: MIRA, a Benchmark for Visual Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02779/) (2025)
- [A Theoretical Framework for OOD Robustness in Transformers using Gevrey Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12991/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Geometry-Aware MCTS for Extremal Problems in Combinatorial Geometry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26399/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Integrating reasoning in large language models and large vision-language models has recently led to significant improvement of their capabilities. However, the generalization of reasoning models is still vaguely defined and poorly understood. In this work, we present an evaluation framework to rigorously examine how well chain-of-thought (CoT) approaches generalize on a simple planning task. Specifically, we consider a grid-based navigation task in which a model is provided with a map and must output a sequence of moves that guides a player from a start position to a goal while avoiding obstacles. The versatility of the task and its data allows us to fine-tune model variants using different input representations (visual and textual) and CoT reasoning strategies, and systematically evaluate them under both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) test conditions. Our experiments show that, while CoT reasoning improves in-distribution generalization across all representations, out-of-distribution generalization (e.g., to larger maps) remains very limited in most cases when controlling for trivial matches with the ID data. Surprisingly, we find that reasoning traces which combine multiple text formats yield the best (and non-trivial) OOD generalization. Finally, purely text-based models consistently outperform those utilizing image-based inputs, including a recently proposed approach relying on latent space reasoning.