# Measuring and Mitigating Post-hoc Rationalization in Reverse Chain-of-Thought Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14469 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14469/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 50 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 50)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10625/) (2022)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09687/) (2023)
- [Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13702/) (2023)
- [Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04091/) (2023)
- [From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11939/) (2024)
- [Abductive Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05739/) (2019)
- [Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13379/) (2023)
- [Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15402/) (2023)
- [MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17399/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08679/) (2025)
- [Distilling Reasoning Capabilities into Smaller Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00193/) (2022)
- [Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13950/) (2024)
- [Skeleton-of-Thought: Prompting LLMs for Efficient Parallel Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15337/) (2023)
- [Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04614/) (2024)
- [EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06281/) (2023)
- [Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11635/) (2021)
- [On the Hardness of Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10625/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02029/) (2026)
- [Context-CoT: Enhancing Context Learning via High-Quality Reasoning Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25354/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reverse Chain-of-Thought Generation (RCG) synthesizes reasoning traces from query-answer pairs, but answer-visible generation can justify a pre-committed answer rather than derive it. This post-hoc rationalization creates a train-inference mismatch because student models are trained on answer-conditioned traces but must reason without answer access at inference time. We quantify this mismatch through lexical, trajectory, and probabilistic anchoring, measuring surface overlap, answer-conditioned generation dynamics, and answer recoverability from the trace, respectively. We find that semantic suppression, a seemingly intuitive mitigation, reduces lexical overlap but increases trajectory anchoring: avoiding the answer requires continually tracking it, thereby strengthening its influence on generation. We therefore propose Structural Skeleton-guided Reasoning (SSR), which replaces suppression with structural decoupling by first generating an abstract functional skeleton and then using it to guide the full reasoning trace. Anchoring analyses show that SSR reduces all three forms of answer dependence. Across in-domain and out-of-distribution benchmarks, its distilled variant, SSR-D, improves performance by up to 10 points over suppression baselines and better preserves out-of-distribution performance. Code is available at https://github.com/viniferagy/SSR.