# How Do Lexical Senses Correspond Between Spoken German and German Sign Language?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13790 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13790/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09813/) (2020)
- [SemEval-2020 Task 1: Unsupervised Lexical Semantic Change Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.11464/) (2020)
- [Including Signed Languages in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05222/) (2021)
- [Quantitative Survey of the State of the Art in Sign Language Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.09918/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Sign language lexicographers construct bilingual dictionaries by establishing word-to-sign mappings, where polysemous and homonymous words corresponding to different signs across contexts are often underrepresented. A usage-based approach examining how word senses map to signs can identify such novel mappings absent from current dictionaries, enriching lexicographic resources. We address this by analyzing German and German Sign Language (Deutsche Geb"ardensprache, DGS), manually annotating 1,404 word use-to-sign ID mappings derived from 32 words from the German Word Usage Graph (D-WUG) and 49 signs from the Digital Dictionary of German Sign Language (DW-DGS). We identify three correspondence types: Type 1 (one-to-many), Type 2 (many-to-one), and Type 3 (one-to-one), plus No Match cases. We evaluate computational methods: Exact Match (EM) and Semantic Similarity (SS) using SBERT embeddings. SS substantially outperforms EM overall 88.52% vs. 71.31%), with dramatic gains for Type 1 (+52.1 pp). Our work establishes the first annotated dataset for cross-modal sense correspondence and reveals which correspondence patterns are computationally identifiable. Our code and dataset are made publicly available.