# Detecting RLVR Training Data via Structural Convergence of Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11792 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11792/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 31 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12599/) (2025)
- [Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03286/) (2022)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18892/) (2025)
- [Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01456/) (2025)
- [Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24290/) (2025)
- [Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06452/) (2023)
- [Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16789/) (2023)
- [Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01307/) (2025)
- [Logic-RL: Unleashing LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14768/) (2025)
- [FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04872/) (2024)
- [Min-K%++: Improved Baseline for Detecting Pre-Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02936/) (2024)
- [Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06062/) (2023)
- [Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiad](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21934/) (2025)
- [ReCaLL: Membership Inference via Relative Conditional Log-Likelihoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15968/) (2024)
- [JustRL: Scaling a 1.5B LLM with a Simple RL Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.16649/) (2025)
- [One fish, two fish, but not the whole sea: Alignment reduces language models' conceptual diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04427/) (2024)
- [Seed-Coder: Let the Code Model Curate Data for Itself](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03524/) (2025)
- [Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05587/) (2024)
- [Leveraging Online Olympiad-Level Math Problems for LLMs Training and Contamination-Resistant Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14275/) (2025)
- [Rethinking and Refining the Distinct Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13587/) (2022)
- [Diverse Preference Learning for Capabilities and Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08594/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Gains and Collapse in On-Policy Distillation:A Reinforcement Learning Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03185/) (2026)
- [WildTrace: Evaluating Training Data Detection in Realistic Large-Scale LLM Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16152/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is central to training modern reasoning models, but the undisclosed training data raises concerns about benchmark contamination. Unlike pretraining methods, which optimize models using token-level probabilities, RLVR fine-tunes models based on reward feedback from self-generated reasoning trajectories, making conventional likelihood-based detection methods less effective. We show that RLVR induces a distinctive behavioral signature: prompts encountered during RLVR training result in more rigid and similar generations, while unseen prompts retain greater diversity. We introduce Min-kNN Distance, a simple black-box detector that quantifies this collapse by sampling multiple completions for a given prompt and computing the average of the k smallest nearest-neighbor edit distances. Min-kNN Distance requires no access to the reference model or token probabilities. Experiments across multiple RLVR-trained reasoning models show that Min-kNN Distance reliably distinguishes RL-seen examples from unseen ones and outperforms existing membership inference and RL contamination detection baselines.