# Differentially Private and Communication Efficient Large Language Model Split Inference via Stochastic Quantization and Soft Prompt

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11513 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11513/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08821/) (2021)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00536/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05679/) (2021)
- [Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06500/) (2021)
- [Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11765/) (2023)
- [Flocks of Stochastic Parrots: Differentially Private Prompt Learning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15594/) (2023)
- [Differential Privacy for Text Analytics via Natural Text Sanitization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01221/) (2021)
- [On Transferability of Prompt Tuning for Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06719/) (2021)
- [DP-Forward: Fine-tuning and Inference on Language Models with Differential Privacy in Forward Pass](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06746/) (2023)
- [Differentially Private Optimization on Large Model at Small Cost](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00038/) (2022)
- [Harnessing large-language models to generate private synthetic text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01684/) (2023)
- [Differential privacy and robust statistics in high dimensions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06578/) (2021)
- [Pangu Embedded: An Efficient Dual-system LLM Reasoner with Metacognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22375/) (2025)
- [A Customized Text Sanitization Mechanism with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01193/) (2022)
- [Can we Soft Prompt LLMs for Graph Learning Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10359/) (2024)
- [Hide and Seek (HaS): A Lightweight Framework for Prompt Privacy Protection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03057/) (2023)
- [Why Is Public Pretraining Necessary for Private Model Training?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09483/) (2023)
- [Split-and-Denoise: Protect large language model inference with local differential privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09130/) (2023)
- [InfoPrompt: Information-Theoretic Soft Prompt Tuning for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04933/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.24468/) (2026)
- [From Acoustic Sensing to Physical Actions: A Comprehensive Survey of Security Risks in Edge-Deployed Audio LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15390/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance and received significant research interest. The enormous computational demands, however, hinder the local deployment on devices with limited resources. The current prevalent LLM inference paradigms require users to send queries to the service providers for processing, which raises critical privacy concerns. Existing approaches propose to allow the users to obfuscate the token embeddings before transmission and utilize local models for denoising. Nonetheless, transmitting the token embeddings and deploying local models may result in excessive communication and computation overhead, preventing practical implementation. In this work, we propose DEL, a framework for Differentially private and communication Efficient LLM split inference. More specifically, an embedding projection module and a differentially private stochastic quantization mechanism are proposed to reduce the communication overhead in a privacy-preserving manner. To eliminate the need for local models, we adapt soft prompt at the server side to compensate for the utility degradation caused by privacy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that utilizes soft prompt to improve the trade-off between privacy and utility in LLM inference, and extensive experiments on text generation and natural language understanding benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
