# Latent Thoughts Tuning: Bridging Context and Reasoning with Fused Information in Latent Tokens

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10229 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10229/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 35 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07191/) (2021)
- [Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06769/) (2024)
- [Universal Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03819/) (2018)
- [Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.01413/) (2016)
- [Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03373/) (2025)
- [Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02226/) (2023)
- [CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21074/) (2025)
- [Compressed Chain of Thought: Efficient Reasoning Through Dense Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13171/) (2024)
- [Let's Think Dot by Dot: Hidden Computation in Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15758/) (2024)
- [Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01460/) (2023)
- [Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25741/) (2025)
- [Seed1.5-Thinking: Advancing Superb Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13914/) (2025)
- [Looped Transformers are Better at Learning Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12424/) (2023)
- [Mixture-of-Recursions: Learning Dynamic Recursive Depths for Adaptive Token-Level Computation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10524/) (2025)
- [Soft Thinking: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of LLMs in Continuous Concept Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15778/) (2025)
- [SoftCoT: Soft Chain-of-Thought for Efficient Reasoning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12134/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Latent Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06203/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Beyond Language: A Comprehensive Survey on Latent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16782/) (2025)
- [SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20317/) (2025)
- [Can Looped Transformers Learn to Implement Multi-step Gradient Descent for In-context Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08292/) (2024)
- [Soft Tokens, Hard Truths](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19170/) (2025)
- [SwiReasoning: Switch-Thinking in Latent and Explicit for Pareto-Superior Reasoning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05069/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02029/) (2026)
- [Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29068/) (2026)
- [Tyler: Typed Latent Reasoning for Language Models -- When to Think, What to Compute, and How Much to Allocate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.16360/) (2026)
- [Decoding Looped Transformers Better for (Almost) Free](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02185/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) equips Large Language Models (LLMs) with strong reasoning capabilities, it constrains the model's thoughts to a discrete vocabulary space. Recently, reasoning in continuous latent space has emerged as a promising alternative, but current paradigms suffer from feature collapse and instability due to distribution mismatch when recurrently reusing hidden states, or alignment issues when relying on assistant models. To address this, we propose Latent Thoughts Tuning (LT-Tuning), a post-training framework that redefines how latent thoughts are constructed and deployed. Instead of relying solely on raw hidden states, our method introduces a Context-Prediction-Fusion mechanism that jointly leverages contextual hidden states and predictive semantic guidance from the vocabulary embedding space. Combined with a progressive three-stage curriculum learning pipeline, LT-Tuning also enables dynamic switching between latent and explicit thinking modes. Experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms existing latent reasoning baselines, effectively mitigating feature collapse and achieving robust reasoning accuracy.