# MILE-RefHumEval: A Reference-Free, Multi-Independent LLM Framework for Human-Aligned Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09624 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09624/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02114/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17926/) (2023)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12626/) (2020)
- [JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17631/) (2023)
- [Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18796/) (2024)
- [MMAU: A Massive Multi-Task Audio Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19168/) (2024)
- [USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00456/) (2020)
- [Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examiner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04181/) (2023)
- [Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18370/) (2024)
- [Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models via Multi-Agent Peer Review Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08152/) (2023)
- [Auto-Arena: Automating LLM Evaluations with Agent Peer Battles and Committee Discussions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20267/) (2024)
- [Code Comprehension then Auditing for Unsupervised LLM Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03131/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Analysis on Large Language Models in Debate Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00050/) (2024)
- [Quality Estimation for Image Captions Based on Large-scale Human Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03396/) (2019)
- [Fusion-Eval: Integrating Assistant Evaluators with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09204/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce MILE-RefHumEval, a reference-free framework for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) without ground-truth annotations or evaluator coordination. It leverages an ensemble of independently prompted evaluators guided by a human-aligned schema, supporting both discrete and continuous scoring judgement. With task-specific prompts from best candidate selection, summarization and image captioning to dialogue, MILE-RefHumEval provides flexible, interpretable, and scalable assessments. Experiments show it aligns closely with human judgments, outperforms prior methods, and reduces computational overhead, offering an efficient, robust, and human-aligned solution for real-world LLM evaluation.