# LingxiDiagBench: A Multi-Agent Framework for Benchmarking LLMs in Chinese Psychiatric Consultation and Diagnosis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09379 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09379/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 7 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Medical and scientific domain agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/medical-and-scientific-domain-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07960/) (2024)
- [Baichuan-M2: Scaling Medical Capability with Large Verifier System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02208/) (2025)
- [MentalChat16K: A Benchmark Dataset for Conversational Mental Health Assistance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13509/) (2025)
- [MDD-5k: A New Diagnostic Conversation Dataset for Mental Disorders Synthesized via Neuro-Symbolic LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12142/) (2024)
- [MedDialogRubrics: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Evaluation Framework for Multi-turn Medical Consultations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03023/) (2026)
- [The Multi-Round Diagnostic RAG Framework for Emulating Clinical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07724/) (2025)
- [MiraMind: Benchmarking Reliable Mental Health Reasoning beyond Answer Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09636/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [MedDialBench: Benchmarking LLM Diagnostic Robustness under Parametric Adversarial Patient Behaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06846/) (2026)
- [MIND: Unified Inquiry and Diagnosis RL with Criteria Grounded Clinical Supports for Psychiatric Consultation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03677/) (2026)
- [MentalHospital: A Virtual Environment for Evaluating Psychiatric Clinical Encounters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08257/) (2026)
- [From Pattern Recognizers to Personalized Companions: A Survey of Large Language Models in Mental Health](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25186/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mental disorders are highly prevalent worldwide, but the shortage of psychiatrists and the inherent subjectivity of interview-based diagnosis create substantial barriers to timely and consistent mental-health assessment. Progress in AI-assisted psychiatric diagnosis is constrained by the absence of benchmarks that simultaneously provide realistic patient simulation, clinician-verified diagnostic labels, and support for dynamic multi-turn consultation. We present LingxiDiagBench, a large-scale multi-agent benchmark that evaluates LLMs on both static diagnostic inference and dynamic multi-turn psychiatric consultation in Chinese. At its core is LingxiDiag-16K, a dataset of 16,000 EMR-aligned synthetic consultation dialogues designed to reproduce real clinical demographic and diagnostic distributions across 12 ICD-10 psychiatric categories. Through extensive experiments across state-of-the-art LLMs, we establish key findings: (1) although LLMs achieve high accuracy on binary depression--anxiety classification (up to 92.3%), performance deteriorates substantially for depression--anxiety comorbidity recognition (43.0%) and 12-way differential diagnosis (28.5%); (2) dynamic consultation often underperforms static evaluation, indicating that ineffective information-gathering strategies significantly impair downstream diagnostic reasoning; (3) consultation quality assessed by LLM-as-a-Judge shows only moderate correlation with diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that well-structured questioning alone does not ensure correct diagnostic decisions. We release LingxiDiag-16K and the full evaluation framework to support reproducible research at https://github.com/Lingxi-mental-health/LingxiDiagBench.