# Deep Learning-Based Fixation Type Prediction for Quality Assurance in Digital Pathology

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08652 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08652/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02057/) (2021)
- [iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07832/) (2021)
- [Vision Transformers Need Registers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16588/) (2023)
- [Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.06560/) (2016)
- [Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00738/) (2024)
- [Three things everyone should know about Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09795/) (2022)
- [Multimodal Multitask Representation Learning for Pathology Biobank Metadata Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.07846/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate annotation of fixation type is a critical step in slide preparation for pathology laboratories. However, this manual process is prone to errors, impacting downstream analyses and diagnostic accuracy. Existing methods for verifying formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE), and frozen section (FS) fixation types typically require full-resolution whole-slide images (WSIs), limiting scalability for high-throughput quality control. We propose a deep-learning model to predict fixation types using low-resolution, pre-scan thumbnail images. The model was trained on WSIs from the TUM Institute of Pathology (n=1,200, Leica GT450DX) and evaluated on a class-balanced subset of The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset (TCGA, n=8,800, Leica AT2), as well as on class-balanced datasets from Augsburg (n=695 [392 FFPE, 303 FS], Philips UFS) and Regensburg (n=202, 3DHISTECH P1000). Our model achieves an AUROC of 0.88 on TCGA, outperforming comparable pre-scan methods by 4.8%. It also achieves AUROCs of 0.72 on Regensburg and Augsburg slides, underscoring challenges related to scanner-induced domain shifts. Furthermore, the model processes each slide in 21 ms, 400× faster than existing high-magnification, full-resolution methods, enabling rapid, high-throughput processing. This approach provides an efficient solution for detecting labelling errors without relying on high-magnification scans, offering a valuable tool for quality control in high-throughput pathology workflows. Future work will improve and evaluate the model's generalisation to additional scanner types. Our findings suggest that this method can increase accuracy and efficiency in digital pathology workflows and may be extended to other low-resolution slide annotations.