# Is Meta-Path Attention an Explanation? Evidence of Alignment and Decoupling in Heterogeneous GNNs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08500 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08500/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Attention is not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10186/) (2019)
- [GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03894/) (2019)
- [Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.07293/) (2019)
- [Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07243/) (2019)
- [Attention is not not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04626/) (2019)
- [Graph Transformer Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.06455/) (2019)
- [MAGNN: Metapath Aggregated Graph Neural Network for Heterogeneous Graph Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.01680/) (2020)
- [On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph Explorations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05152/) (2021)
- [PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05788/) (2020)
- [Are we really making much progress? Revisiting, benchmarking, and refining heterogeneous graph neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14936/) (2021)
- [Explainability Techniques for Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13686/) (2019)
- [GraphSVX: Shapley Value Explanations for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10482/) (2021)
- [Towards Transparent and Explainable Attention Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14243/) (2020)
- [GNNShap: Scalable and Accurate GNN Explanation using Shapley Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04829/) (2024)
- [Automated Heterogeneous Network learning with Non-Recursive Message Passing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07598/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Meta-path-based heterogeneous graph neural networks aggregate over meta-path-induced views, and their semantic-level attention over meta-path channels is widely used as a narrative for ``which semantics matter.'' We study this assumption empirically by asking: when does meta-path attention reflect meta-path importance, and when can it decouple? A key challenge is that most post-hoc GNN explainers are designed for homogeneous graphs, and naive adaptations to heterogeneous neighborhoods can mix semantics and confound perturbations. To enable a controlled empirical analysis, we introduce MetaXplain, a meta-path-aware post-hoc explanation protocol that applies existing explainers in the native meta-path view domain via (i) view-factorized explanations, (ii) schema-valid channel-wise perturbations, and (iii) fusion-aware attribution, without modifying the underlying predictor. We benchmark representative gradient-, perturbation-, and Shapley-style explainers on ACM, DBLP, and IMDB with HAN and HAN-GCN, comparing against xPath and type-matched random baselines under standard faithfulness metrics. To quantify attention reliability, we propose Meta-Path Attention--Explanation Alignment (MP-AEA), which measures rank correlation between learned attention weights and explanation-derived meta-path contribution scores across random runs. Our results show that meta-path-aware explanations typically outperform random controls, while MP-AEA reveals both high-alignment and statistically significant decoupling regimes depending on the dataset and backbone; moreover, retraining on explanation-induced subgraphs often preserves, and in some noisy regimes improves, predictive performance, suggesting an explanation-as-denoising effect.