# Don't Always Pick the Highest-Performing Model: An Information Theoretic View of LLM Ensemble Selection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08003 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08003/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05176/) (2023)
- [Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10403/) (2022)
- [Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04850/) (2023)
- [Harnessing Multiple Large Language Models: A Survey on LLM Ensemble](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18036/) (2025)
- [Learning to Maximize Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00557/) (2023)
- [LLM-TOPLA: Efficient LLM Ensemble by Maximising Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03953/) (2024)
- [Beyond Majority Voting: LLM Aggregation by Leveraging Higher-Order Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01499/) (2025)
- [Estimating Conditional Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03301/) (2023)
- [Simple Yet Effective: An Information-Theoretic Approach to Multi-LLM Uncertainty Quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07236/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Refuse Questions They Do Not Know? Measuring Knowledge-Aware Refusal in Factual Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01782/) (2025)
- [Cost-aware LLM-based Online Dataset Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15101/) (2025)
- [Balancing Information Accuracy and Response Timeliness in Networked LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02209/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Nine Judges, Two Effective Votes: Correlated Errors Undermine LLM Evaluation Panels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29800/) (2026)
- [When Does Combining Language Models Help? A Co-Failure Ceiling on Routing, Voting, and Mixture-of-Agents Across 67 Frontier Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.27288/) (2026)
- [Are Diversity Metrics Measuring Diversity? A Capability-Controlled Audit of Majority-Vote Gain in LLM Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20768/) (2026)
- [Mixture of Complementary Agents for Robust LLM Ensemble](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24048/) (2026)
- [The Honest Quorum Problem: Epistemic Byzantine Fault Tolerance for Agentic Infrastructure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.16109/) (2026)
- [Harnessing Disagreement: Detecting Correlated Agreement Blindness in Multi-Agent Triage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.19899/) (2026)
- [A Communication-Theoretic Framework for LLM Agents: Cost-Aware Adaptive Reliability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09121/) (2026)
- [Diverse Evidence, Better Forecasts: Multi-Agent Deliberation Under Information Asymmetry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01661/) (2026)
- [Keep, Customize, or Exit: Default Design and Token Pricing in LLM Reasoning Services](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13315/) (2026)
- [Which Models Work Well Together? Measuring Heterogeneity for LLM Team Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38274/) (2026)
- [CopRoute: Dependence-Aware Conformal Routing for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13276/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are often ensembled together to improve overall reliability and robustness, but in practice models are strongly correlated. This raises a fundamental question: which models should be selected when forming an LLM ensemble? We formulate budgeted ensemble selection as maximizing the mutual information between the true label and predictions of the selected models. Furthermore, to explain why performance can saturate even with many models, we model the correlated errors of the models using Gaussian-copula and show an information-theoretic error floor for the performance of the ensemble. Motivated by these, we propose a simple greedy mutual-information selection algorithm that estimates the required information terms directly from data and iteratively builds an ensemble under a query budget. We test our approach in two question answering datasets and one binary sentiment classification dataset: MEDMCQA, MMLU, and IMDB movie reviews. Across all datasets, we observe that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines under the same query budget.
