# Long-Context Long-Form Question Answering for Legal Domain

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07190 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07190/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [RQ-RAG: Learning to Refine Queries for Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00610/) (2024)
- [RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14431/) (2024)
- [LongRAG: A Dual-Perspective Retrieval-Augmented Generation Paradigm for Long-Context Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18050/) (2024)
- [DMQR-RAG: Diverse Multi-Query Rewriting for RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13154/) (2024)
- [Legal Question-Answering in the Indian Context: Efficacy, Challenges, and Potential of Modern AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14735/) (2023)
- [Vision-Guided Chunking Is All You Need: Enhancing RAG with Multimodal Document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16035/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [MIDR: Enrichment-Augmented Indexing for Multimodal Document Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.01316/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Legal documents have complex document layouts involving multiple nested sections, lengthy footnotes and further use specialized linguistic devices like intricate syntax and domain-specific vocabulary to ensure precision and authority. These inherent characteristics of legal documents make question answering challenging, and particularly so when the answer to the question spans several pages (i.e. requires long-context) and is required to be comprehensive (i.e. a long-form answer). In this paper, we address the challenges of long-context question answering in context of long-form answers given the idiosyncrasies of legal documents. We propose a question answering system that can (a) deconstruct domain-specific vocabulary for better retrieval from source documents, (b) parse complex document layouts while isolating sections and footnotes and linking them appropriately, (c) generate comprehensive answers using precise domain-specific vocabulary. We also introduce a coverage metric that classifies the performance into recall-based coverage categories allowing human users to evaluate the recall with ease. We curate a QA dataset by leveraging the expertise of professionals from fields such as law and corporate tax. Through comprehensive experiments and ablation studies, we demonstrate the usability and merit of the proposed system.