# Attention-Mass Condensation for Sparse Decoding

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06317 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06317/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14135/) (2022)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17453/) (2023)
- [Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14062/) (2020)
- [Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.10509/) (2019)
- [H2O: Heavy-Hitter Oracle for Efficient Generative Inference of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14048/) (2023)
- [Quest: Query-Aware Sparsity for Efficient Long-Context LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10774/) (2024)
- [Native Sparse Attention: Hardware-Aligned and Natively Trainable Sparse Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11089/) (2025)
- [DuoAttention: Efficient Long-Context LLM Inference with Retrieval and Streaming Heads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10819/) (2024)
- [FlashInfer: Efficient and Customizable Attention Engine for LLM Inference Serving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01005/) (2025)
- [SeerAttention: Learning Intrinsic Sparse Attention in Your LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13276/) (2024)
- [TokenSelect: Efficient Long-Context Inference and Length Extrapolation for LLMs via Dynamic Token-Level KV Cache Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02886/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Attention-mass concentration creates an opportunity for sparse decoding, but retained mass alone does not guarantee a stable greedy decision: retrieval error, omitted value directions, and recursive decoding all matter. We formalize this distinction with an exact omitted-mass identity and a sufficient downstream margin condition, then characterize a query-dependent mean-pooled block selector. On Qwen2-0.5B, a paired fresh-selection sweep covers supports of 97--769 positions, contexts of 2K--16K, and five prefixes per context. The primary exact-match result is that none of 60 runs remains identical to dense decoding through 128 tokens. Distributional quality is distinct: for supports of at least 193, seven of nine context-support conditions have median teacher-forced continuation perplexity changes within 5% of dense, but prompt-level ranges include severe 16K outliers. All seven runs with teacher-forced match below 70% have perplexity increases above 100%; these observations come from two prefixes and suggest a warning regime, not a general threshold. The measured perplexity is teacher-forced on the dense model's own continuation, not the sparse model's free-running output. Separate retrieval and attention-mass probes illustrate why captured mass alone is not a retrieval or decision guarantee. Isolated operator timings do not establish matched-quality acceleration or end-to-end serving speed.