# VRIQ: Benchmarking and Analyzing Visual-Reasoning IQ of VLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05382 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05382/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 26 of its 78 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16125/) (2023)
- [MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14624/) (2024)
- [Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14804/) (2024)
- [MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02813/) (2024)
- [SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10635/) (2023)
- [What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19785/) (2023)
- [TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12524/) (2023)
- [Open3D-VQA: A Benchmark for Comprehensive Spatial Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Model in Open Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11094/) (2025)
- [DesignQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models' Understanding of Engineering Documentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07917/) (2024)
- [SPHERE: Unveiling Spatial Blind Spots in Vision-Language Models Through Hierarchical Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12693/) (2024)
- [MM-IQ: Benchmarking Human-Like Abstraction and Reasoning in Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00698/) (2025)
- [Open-ended VQA benchmarking of Vision-Language models by exploiting Classification datasets and their semantic hierarchy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07270/) (2024)
- [PuzzleBench: A Fully Dynamic Evaluation Framework for Large Multimodal Models on Puzzle Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10885/) (2025)
- [EEE-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Electrical And Electronics Engineering Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01492/) (2024)
- [PuzzleWorld: A Benchmark for Multimodal, Open-Ended Reasoning in Puzzlehunts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06211/) (2025)
- [E2M: Double Bounded α-Divergence Optimization for Tensor-based Discrete Density Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18220/) (2024)
- [Vision language models are unreliable at trivial spatial cognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16061/) (2025)
- [Diverse and Tailored Image Generation for Zero-shot Multi-label Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03144/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Do Vision-Language Models Truly Perform Vision Reasoning? A Rigorous Study of the Modality Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16256/) (2026)
- [NeuroMambaLLM: Dynamic Graph Learning of fMRI Functional Connectivity in Autistic Brains Using Mamba and Language Model Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13770/) (2026)
- [StemBind: When MLLMs Get Lost Between Rules and Instances in Abstract Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00148/) (2026)
- [ChronoVision: Temporal Reasoning via Latent State Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05631/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language model (VLM) errors on visual reasoning may come from missing visual structure, from mistakes after that structure is extracted, or from both. We introduce VRIQ, a benchmark of 1,391 human-verified IQ-style visual reasoning puzzles spanning five psychometric categories, each instantiated in category-matched abstract and natural-image domains. To study perception and reasoning more directly, we also introduce DiagVRIQ, a 209-item diagnostic subset paired with human-verified, rule-neutral textual descriptions. Across 21 VLMs, the 17 non-frontier models reach a 26.8% unweighted category mean on abstract puzzles, while three 2026 frontier models improve substantially but unevenly, with unweighted category means of 41.3--70.9% on abstract puzzles and at most 78.2% on natural-image puzzles; all remain below human performance. On DiagVRIQ, even when their descriptions are judged correct, the strongest models still answer approximately 9--12% of those items incorrectly. Two interventions, ground-truth description augmentation and tool-augmented inference, improve accuracy, with the largest tool gains on spatially demanding categories, but neither eliminates errors. VRIQ and DiagVRIQ provide a framework for studying visual reasoning through complementary end-to-end, description-based, and intervention-based analyses rather than treating it as a single monolithic capability.