# FedMosaic: Federated Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Parametric Adapters

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05235 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05235/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 34 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG pipeline design and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-pipeline-design-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08909/) (2020)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03099/) (2023)
- [A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06211/) (2024)
- [The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06643/) (2018)
- [Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12827/) (2023)
- [Towards Building the Federated GPT: Federated Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05644/) (2023)
- [The Good and The Bad: Exploring Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16893/) (2024)
- [FLoRA: Federated Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Heterogeneous Low-Rank Adaptations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05976/) (2024)
- [Twin-Merging: Dynamic Integration of Modular Expertise in Model Merging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15479/) (2024)
- [EMR-Merging: Tuning-Free High-Performance Model Merging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17461/) (2024)
- [Lift Yourself Up: Retrieval-augmented Text Generation with Self Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02437/) (2023)
- [MedRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-augmented Generation with Knowledge Graph-Elicited Reasoning for Healthcare Copilot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04413/) (2025)
- [ReLLa: Retrieval-enhanced Large Language Models for Lifelong Sequential Behavior Comprehension in Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11131/) (2023)
- [Differentially Private Synthetic Data via Foundation Model APIs 2: Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01749/) (2024)
- [Augmentation-Adapted Retriever Improves Generalization of Language Models as Generic Plug-In](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17331/) (2023)
- [Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16111/) (2023)
- [DRAGIN: Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation based on the Information Needs of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10081/) (2024)
- [Mitigating the Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) via Pure Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14773/) (2024)
- [Parametric Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15915/) (2025)
- [Understand What LLM Needs: Dual Preference Alignment for Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18676/) (2024)
- [Retrieval Augmented Generation with Collaborative Filtering for Personalized Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05731/) (2025)
- [FeB4RAG: Evaluating Federated Search in the Context of Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11891/) (2024)
- [Random Masking Finds Winning Tickets for Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02596/) (2024)
- [Shifting from Ranking to Set Selection for Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06838/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [FD-RAG: Federated Dual-System Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27432/) (2026)
- [Beyond Raw Context Transfer: Representation-based Federated Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.22162/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding generation in external knowledge to improve factuality and reduce hallucinations. Yet most deployments assume a centralized corpus, which is infeasible in privacy aware domains where knowledge remains siloed. This motivates federated RAG (FedRAG), where a central LLM server collaborates with distributed silos without sharing raw documents. In context RAG violates this requirement by transmitting verbatim documents, whereas parametric RAG encodes documents into lightweight adapters that merge with a frozen LLM at inference, avoiding raw-text exchange. We adopt the parametric approach but face two unique challenges induced by FedRAG: high storage and communication from per-document adapters, and destructive aggregation caused by indiscriminately merging multiple adapters. We present FedMosaic, the first federated RAG framework built on parametric adapters. FedMosaic clusters semantically related documents into multi-document adapters with document-specific masks to reduce overhead while preserving specificity, and performs selective adapter aggregation to combine only relevance-aligned, nonconflicting adapters. Experiments show that FedMosaic achieves an average 10.9% higher accuracy than state-of-the-art methods in four categories, while lowering storage costs by 78.8% to 86.3% and communication costs by 91.4%, and never sharing raw documents.