# Investigating Disability Representations in Text-to-Image Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04687 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04687/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 44 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 44)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06125/) (2022)
- [Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11487/) (2022)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08402/) (2022)
- [LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02114/) (2021)
- [Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10789/) (2022)
- [Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14050/) (2020)
- [Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.07187/) (2016)
- [Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00770/) (2023)
- [Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01963/) (2021)
- [Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13219/) (2021)
- [Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03759/) (2022)
- [Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.05345/) (2020)
- [DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04053/) (2022)
- [Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00813/) (2020)
- [TimeLMs: Diachronic Language Models from Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03829/) (2022)
- [Editing Implicit Assumptions in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08084/) (2023)
- [Social Biases through the Text-to-Image Generation Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06034/) (2023)
- [How well can Text-to-Image Generative Models understand Ethical Natural Language Interventions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15230/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14168/) (2021)
- [Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14574/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Race, Racism, and Anti-Racism in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11410/) (2021)
- [TweetNLP: Cutting-Edge Natural Language Processing for Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14774/) (2022)
- [Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01030/) (2024)
- [Measuring Social Biases in Grounded Vision and Language Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08911/) (2020)
- [LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12864/) (2025)
- [Worst of Both Worlds: Biases Compound in Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08666/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image generative models have made remarkable progress in producing high-quality visual content from textual descriptions, yet concerns remain about how they represent social groups. While characteristics like gender and race have received increasing attention, disability representations remain underexplored. This study investigates how people with disabilities are represented in AI-generated images by analyzing outputs from Stable Diffusion XL and DALL-E 3 using a structured prompt design. We analyze disability representations by comparing image similarities between generic disability prompts and prompts referring to specific disability categories. Moreover, we evaluate how mitigation strategies influence disability portrayals, with a focus on assessing affective framing through sentiment polarity analysis, combining both automatic and human evaluation. Our findings reveal persistent representational imbalances and highlight the need for continuous evaluation and refinement of generative models to foster more diverse and inclusive portrayals of disability.