# Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating Posterior Fidelity of Diffusion Inverse Solvers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04189 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04189/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Inverse problems and image restoration, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 36 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Inverse problems and image restoration](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/inverse-problems-and-image-restoration/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02502/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00364/) (2022)
- [What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04977/) (2017)
- [Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14687/) (2022)
- [Denoising Diffusion Restoration Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11793/) (2022)
- [Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.09457/) (2019)
- [Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Denoising Diffusion Null-Space Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00490/) (2022)
- [Solving Inverse Problems in Medical Imaging with Score-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08005/) (2021)
- [fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.08839/) (2018)
- [Denoising Diffusion Models for Plug-and-Play Image Restoration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08995/) (2023)
- [Score-based diffusion models for accelerated MRI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05243/) (2021)
- [Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.01368/) (2021)
- [A Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for Goodness-of-fit Tests and Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.03253/) (2016)
- [A Variational Perspective on Solving Inverse Problems with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04391/) (2023)
- [Solving Inverse Problems with Latent Diffusion Models via Hard Data Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08123/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00083/) (2024)
- [Improving Diffusion Inverse Problem Solving with Decoupled Noise Annealing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01521/) (2024)
- [Measuring Sample Quality with Kernels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01717/) (2017)
- [Principled Probabilistic Imaging using Diffusion Models as Plug-and-Play Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18782/) (2024)
- [Measuring Sample Quality with Stein's Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03039/) (2015)
- [InverseBench: Benchmarking Plug-and-Play Diffusion Priors for Inverse Problems in Physical Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11043/) (2025)
- [Monte Carlo guided Diffusion for Bayesian linear inverse problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07983/) (2023)
- [Solving Audio Inverse Problems with a Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15228/) (2022)
- [Estimating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty with a Single Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03478/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty Quantification in Deep MRI Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.11228/) (2019)
- [Bayesian MRI Reconstruction with Joint Uncertainty Estimation using Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01479/) (2022)
- [Plug-and-Play split Gibbs sampler: embedding deep generative priors in Bayesian inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11134/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty evaluation is critical in scientific and engineering inverse problems. However, existing benchmarks on Diffusion Inverse Solvers (DIS) primarily focus on reconstruction accuracy but overlook uncertainty and distributional behavior. Since stochastic inverse solvers represent uncertainty through diffusion-based posterior samples, evaluating how well their generated samples capture the target posterior distribution becomes an important aspect of uncertainty quantification. To address this limitation and better understand the distributional behavior of diffusion samplers, we conduct a systematic study to investigate the posterior fidelity of a broad range of existing DIS methods in controlled simulation settings with a known analytical true posterior. Furthermore, to enable posterior-aware evaluation on real-world inverse problems where ground-truth posterior is unavailable, we propose score-based Kernel Stein Discrepancy (score-KSD), a theoretically-grounded and ground-truth-free metric that measures the consistency of the distribution of generated samples from a DIS method with the target posterior score field, induced by the forward model and learned diffusion prior. Through both simulation experiments and real-world inverse problem solving, we validate the effectiveness of the proposed score-KSD and demonstrate that it provides meaningful posterior fidelity diagnostics beyond reconstruction accuracy, revealing that higher reconstruction accuracy does not necessarily imply better posterior consistency.