# Decoding Ambiguous Emotions with Test-Time Scaling in Audio-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03873 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03873/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Audio-language model reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Audio-language model reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/audio-language-model-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20215/) (2025)
- [Qwen2-Audio Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10759/) (2024)
- [Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00720/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24235/) (2025)
- [Nemotron-4 340B Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11704/) (2024)
- [Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06703/) (2025)
- [Audio Flamingo 2: An Audio-Language Model with Long-Audio Understanding and Expert Reasoning Abilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.03983/) (2025)
- [Forest-of-Thought: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Enhancing LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09078/) (2024)
- [Audio-Visual LLM for Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06720/) (2023)
- [The Ambiguous World of Emotion Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00360/) (2019)
- [From Text to Emotion: Unveiling the Emotion Annotation Capabilities of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.17026/) (2024)
- [Rethinking the Role of Prompting Strategies in LLM Test-Time Scaling: A Perspective of Probability Theory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10981/) (2025)
- [Handling Ambiguity in Emotion: From Out-of-Domain Detection to Distribution Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12862/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SHALA-LLM: Smartly Handling Ambiguous Labels in Aligning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05376/) (2026)
- [Whose Ground Truth? Embracing Ambiguity in Human-Centered AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.10805/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Emotion recognition from human speech is a critical enabler for socially aware conversational AI. However, while most prior work frames emotion recognition as a categorical classification problem, real-world affective states are often ambiguous, overlapping, and context-dependent, posing significant challenges for both annotation and automatic modeling. Recent large-scale audio language models (ALMs) offer new opportunities for nuanced affective reasoning without explicit emotion supervision, but their capacity to handle ambiguous emotions remains underexplored. At the same time, advances in inference-time techniques such as test-time scaling (TTS) have shown promise for improving generalization and adaptability in hard NLP tasks, but their relevance to affective computing is still largely unknown. In this work, we introduce the first benchmark for ambiguous emotion recognition in speech with ALMs under test-time scaling. Our evaluation systematically compares eight state-of-the-art ALMs and five TTS strategies across three prominent speech emotion datasets. We further provide an in-depth analysis of the interaction between model capacity, TTS, and affective ambiguity, offering new insights into the computational and representational challenges of ambiguous emotion understanding. Our benchmark establishes a foundation for developing more robust, context-aware, and emotionally intelligent speech-based AI systems, and highlights key future directions for bridging the gap between model assumptions and the complexity of real-world human emotion.