# Instruction Anchor: Dissecting the Mechanistic Dynamics of Modality Arbitration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03677 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03677/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 45 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14238/) (2023)
- [Towards VQA Models That Can Read](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08920/) (2019)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12793/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10302/) (2024)
- [Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14680/) (2022)
- [Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14767/) (2023)
- [ALLaVA: Harnessing GPT4V-Synthesized Data for Lite Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11684/) (2024)
- [GUIOdyssey: A Comprehensive Dataset for Cross-App GUI Navigation on Mobile Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08451/) (2024)
- [Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07149/) (2024)
- [MultiInstruct: Improving Multi-Modal Zero-Shot Learning via Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10773/) (2022)
- [VisIT-Bench: A Benchmark for Vision-Language Instruction Following Inspired by Real-World Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06595/) (2023)
- [Universal Actions for Enhanced Embodied Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10105/) (2025)
- [Measuring the Mixing of Contextual Information in the Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04212/) (2022)
- [MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01509/) (2024)
- [MM-LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment in Multi-Modal Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12067/) (2023)
- [The Curse of Multi-Modalities: Evaluating Hallucinations of Large Multimodal Models across Language, Visual, and Audio](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12787/) (2024)
- [Explainable and Interpretable Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02104/) (2024)
- [Understanding Information Storage and Transfer in Multi-modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04236/) (2024)
- [MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07957/) (2025)
- [Competition of Mechanisms: Tracing How Language Models Handle Facts and Counterfactuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11655/) (2024)
- [Finding and Editing Multi-Modal Neurons in Pre-Trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07470/) (2023)
- [M2IV: Towards Efficient and Fine-grained Multimodal In-Context Learning via Representation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04633/) (2025)
- [Same Task, Different Circuits: Disentangling Modality-Specific Mechanisms in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09047/) (2025)
- [First SFT, Second RL, Third UPT: Continual Improving Multi-Modal LLM Reasoning via Unsupervised Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22453/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Zooming without Zooming: Region-to-Image Distillation for Fine-Grained Multimodal Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11858/) (2026)
- [OPD-V: Visual On-Policy Self-Distillation with Modality Balance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05131/) (2026)
- [G2TR: Generation-Guided Visual Token Reduction for Separate-Encoder Unified Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12309/) (2026)
- [Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination via Phase-wise Self-reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17982/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Entropy Allocation in LLM-based ASR: Understanding the Dynamics between Speech Encoders and LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08003/) (2026)
- [Devils in Question Relay: Source-Conditioned Relay Steering to Mitigate Hallucinations in Audio-visual Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37568/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modality following is the ability to selectively leverage multimodal contexts based on user instructions. It is fundamental to the safety and reliability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in real-world deployments. However, the internal mechanisms governing this decision-making process remain largely under-explored. In this work, we investigate the mechanism underlying modality following through an information flow perspective. Our findings reveal that instruction tokens serve as structural anchor for modality arbitration: Shallow attention layers perform undifferentiated information transfer, aggregating multimodal cues to instruction tokens as a latent buffer; in contrast, deep attention layers selectively strengthen the instruction-compliant subspace and resolve modality arbitration according to the instruction-specified intent, with a sparse subset of attention heads driving this process. Targeted attention-head interventions further validate the functional specificity of these heads: blocking only 5% of the identified heads substantially degrades modality following while preserving general visual and language capabilities, whereas targeted amplification can restore failed modality-following samples by up to approximately 60%. Together, this work provides a mechanistic account of modality following and informs future efforts to improve how MLLMs integrate and utilize multimodal evidence under user instructions.
