# Unlocking the Duality between Flow and Field Matching

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02261 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02261/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 19 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Flow matching, time series and science](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/flow-matching-time-series-and-science/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00364/) (2022)
- [Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15571/) (2022)
- [Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08797/) (2023)
- [Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00482/) (2023)
- [Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13447/) (2025)
- [Stochastic interpolants with data-dependent couplings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03725/) (2023)
- [Poisson Flow Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11178/) (2022)
- [PFGM++: Unlocking the Potential of Physics-Inspired Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04265/) (2023)
- [On the Closed-Form of Flow Matching: Generalization Does Not Arise from Target Stochasticity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03719/) (2025)
- [GenPhys: From Physical Processes to Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02637/) (2023)
- [Explicit Flow Matching: On The Theory of Flow Matching Algorithms with Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03232/) (2024)
- [Field Matching: an Electrostatic Paradigm to Generate and Transfer Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02367/) (2025)
- [Interaction Field Matching: Overcoming Limitations of Electrostatic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02950/) (2025)
- [Overclocking Electrostatic Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22454/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Bridge Graphical Models: Coupling, Projection, and Current-Preserving Dynamics for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19144/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) unifies conventional generative paradigms such as diffusion models and flow matching. Interaction Field Matching (IFM) is a newer framework that generalizes Electrostatic Field Matching (EFM) rooted in Poisson Flow Generative Models (PFGM). While both frameworks define generative dynamics, they start from different objects: CFM specifies a conditional probability path in data space, whereas IFM specifies a physics-inspired interaction field in an augmented data space. This raises a basic question: are CFM and IFM genuinely different, or are they two descriptions of the same underlying dynamics? We show that they coincide for a natural subclass of IFM that we call forward-only IFM. Specifically, we construct a bijection between CFM and forward-only IFM. We further show that general IFM is strictly more expressive: it includes EFM and other interaction fields that cannot be realized within the standard CFM formulation. Finally, we highlight how this duality can benefit both frameworks: it provides a probabilistic interpretation of forward-only IFM and yields novel, IFM-driven techniques for CFM.
