# Reasoning with Autoregressive-Diffusion Collaborative Thoughts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01608 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01608/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Discrete and text diffusion, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 18 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Discrete and text diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/discrete-and-text-diffusion/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05543/) (2023)
- [Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00796/) (2022)
- [Diffusion Models in Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04747/) (2022)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [CoT-VLA: Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22020/) (2025)
- [Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09403/) (2024)
- [LLM-grounded Diffusion: Enhancing Prompt Understanding of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13655/) (2023)
- [Mastering Text-to-Image Diffusion: Recaptioning, Planning, and Generating with Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11708/) (2024)
- [Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07542/) (2025)
- [PhysGen: Rigid-Body Physics-Grounded Image-to-Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18964/) (2024)
- [LayoutLLM-T2I: Eliciting Layout Guidance from LLM for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05095/) (2023)
- [Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05359/) (2022)
- [Mind's Eye of LLMs: Visualization-of-Thought Elicits Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03622/) (2024)
- [Learning to Localize Objects Improves Spatial Reasoning in Visual-LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07449/) (2024)
- [Vidarc: Embodied Video Diffusion Model for Closed-loop Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.17661/) (2025)
- [InterDyn: Controllable Interactive Dynamics with Video Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11785/) (2024)
- [Iterative Prompt Refinement for Safer Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13760/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Autoregressive and diffusion models represent two complementary generative paradigms. Autoregressive models excel at sequential planning and constraint composition, yet struggle with tasks that require explicit spatial or physical grounding. Diffusion models, in contrast, capture rich spatial structure through high-dimensional generation, but lack the stepwise logical control needed to satisfy complex, multi-stage constraints or to reliably identify and correct errors. We introduce Collaborative Thoughts, a unified collaborative framework that enables autoregressive and diffusion models to reason and generate jointly through a closed-loop interaction. In Collaborative Thoughts, autoregressive models perform structured planning and constraint management, diffusion models instantiate these constraints as intermediate visual thoughts, and a vision-based critic module evaluates whether the visual thoughts satisfy the intended structural and physical requirements. This feedback is then used to iteratively refine subsequent planning and generation steps, mitigating error propagation across modalities. Importantly, Collaborative Thoughts uses the same collaborative loop regardless of whether the task is autoregressive question answering or diffusion-based visual generation. Through representative examples, we illustrate how Collaborative Thoughts can improve the reliability of spatial reasoning and the controllability of generation.