# Multi-Fidelity Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification and Adaptive Residual Learning for Efficient Solution of Parametric Partial Differential Equations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01176 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01176/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04502/) (2019)
- [Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's next](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05624/) (2022)
- [Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09506/) (2021)
- [B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.06097/) (2020)
- [Physics-Constrained Deep Learning for High-dimensional Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification without Labeled Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.06314/) (2019)
- [PhyGeoNet: Physics-Informed Geometry-Adaptive Convolutional Neural Networks for Solving Parameterized Steady-State PDEs on Irregular Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13145/) (2020)
- [Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08327/) (2018)
- [Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12325/) (2021)
- [PINNacle: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08827/) (2023)
- [Improved architectures and training algorithms for deep operator networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01654/) (2021)
- [Error estimates for physics informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09346/) (2022)
- [Multi-fidelity regression using artificial neural networks: efficient approximation of parameter-dependent output quantities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13403/) (2021)
- [Uncertainty quantification for noisy inputs-outputs in physics-informed neural networks and neural operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11262/) (2023)
- [Stacked networks improve physics-informed training: applications to neural networks and deep operator networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06483/) (2023)
- [Multi-Fidelity Residual Neural Processes for Scalable Surrogate Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18846/) (2024)
- [Residual Multi-Fidelity Neural Network Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03572/) (2023)
- [Improved Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networks Using Error Bounds and Solution Bundles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06459/) (2025)
- [Uncertainty Quantification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Extended Fiducial Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19136/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding physical laws directly into neural network training. However, solving high-fidelity PDEs remains computationally prohibitive, particularly for parametric systems requiring multiple evaluations across varying parameter configurations. This paper presents MF-BPINN, a novel multi-fidelity framework that synergistically combines physics-informed neural networks with Bayesian uncertainty quantification and adaptive residual learning. Our approach leverages abundant low-fidelity simulations alongside sparse high-fidelity data through a hierarchical neural architecture that learns nonlinear correlations across fidelity levels. We introduce an adaptive residual network with learnable gating mechanisms that dynamically balances linear and nonlinear fidelity discrepancies. Furthermore, we develop a rigorous Bayesian framework employing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.