# Benchmarking Agents in Insurance Underwriting Environments

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00456 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00456/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07982/) (2025)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07095/) (2024)
- [TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14161/) (2024)
- [PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01848/) (2025)
- [AI Agents That Matter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01502/) (2024)
- [The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02547/) (2025)
- [Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16416/) (2025)
- [The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05467/) (2024)
- [GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04374/) (2025)
- [Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02825/) (2025)
- [Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11977/) (2025)
- [OdysseyBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Complex Office Application Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09124/) (2025)
- [HumanEval Pro and MBPP Pro: Evaluating Large Language Models on Self-invoking Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21199/) (2024)
- [Probing the Multi-turn Planning Capabilities of LLMs via 20 Question Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01468/) (2023)
- [MedAgentGym: A Scalable Agentic Training Environment for Code-Centric Reasoning in Biomedical Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04405/) (2025)
- [Learning to Ask Informative Questions: Enhancing LLMs with Preference Optimization and Expected Information Gain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17453/) (2024)
- [FieldWorkArena: Agentic AI Benchmark for Real Field Work Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19662/) (2025)
- [GuessingGame: Measuring the Informativeness of Open-Ended Questions in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19593/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As AI agents integrate into enterprise applications, their evaluation demands benchmarks that reflect the complexity of real-world operations. Instead, existing benchmarks overemphasize open-domains such as code, use narrow accuracy metrics, and lack authentic complexity. We present UNDERWRITE, an expert-first, multi-turn insurance underwriting benchmark designed in close collaboration with domain experts to capture real-world enterprise challenges. UNDERWRITE introduces critical realism factors often absent in current benchmarks: proprietary business knowledge, noisy tool interfaces, and imperfect simulated users requiring careful information gathering. Evaluating 13 frontier models, we uncover significant gaps between research lab performance and enterprise readiness: the most accurate models are not the most efficient, models hallucinate domain knowledge despite tool access, and pass^k results show a 20% drop in performance. The results from UNDERWRITE demonstrate that expert involvement in benchmark design is essential for realistic agent evaluation, common agentic frameworks exhibit brittleness that skews performance reporting, and hallucination detection in specialized domains demands compositional approaches. Our work provides insights for developing benchmarks that better align with enterprise deployment requirements.