# User Prompting Strategies and Prompt Enhancement Methods for Open-Set Object Detection in XR Environments

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.23281 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.23281/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05499/) (2023)
- [LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03195/) (2019)
- [Grounded Language-Image Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03857/) (2021)
- [CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12063/) (2024)
- [Revisiting Referring Expression Comprehension Evaluation in the Era of Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16866/) (2024)
- [YOLOE: Real-Time Seeing Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07465/) (2025)
- [ViDDAR: Vision Language Model-Based Task-Detrimental Content Detection for Augmented Reality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12553/) (2025)
- [Advancing the Understanding and Evaluation of AR-Generated Scenes: When Vision-Language Models Shine and Stumble](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13964/) (2025)
- [Detecting Visual Information Manipulation Attacks in Augmented Reality: A Multimodal Semantic Reasoning Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20356/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [OV3D-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Open-Vocabulary Monocular 3D Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17110/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Open-set object detection (OSOD) localizes objects while identifying and rejecting unknown classes at inference. While recent OSOD models perform well on benchmarks, their behavior under realistic user prompting remains underexplored. In interactive XR settings, user-generated prompts are often ambiguous, underspecified, or overly detailed. To study prompt-conditioned robustness, we evaluate two OSOD models, GroundingDINO and YOLO-E, on real-world XR images and simulate diverse user prompting behaviors using vision-language models. We consider four prompt types: standard, underdetailed, overdetailed, and pragmatically ambiguous, and examine the impact of two enhancement strategies on these prompts. Results show that both models exhibit stable performance under underdetailed and standard prompts, while they suffer degradation under ambiguous prompts. Overdetailed prompts primarily affect GroundingDINO. Prompt enhancement substantially improves robustness under ambiguity, yielding gains exceeding 55% mIoU and 41% average confidence. Based on the findings, we propose several prompting strategies and prompt enhancement methods for OSOD models in XR environments.