# OVD: On-policy Verbal Distillation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21968 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21968/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 66 of its 84 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)
- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 66)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.03551/) (2017)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03476/) (2016)
- [Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05877/) (2017)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01060/) (2020)
- [WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01206/) (2022)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12983/) (2023)
- [Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03350/) (2022)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14734/) (2024)
- [STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14465/) (2022)
- [On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13649/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00626/) (2026)
- [Uni-OPD: Unifying On-Policy Distillation with a Dual-Perspective Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03677/) (2026)
- [Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01193/) (2026)
- [Prefix Teach, Suffix Fade: Local Teachability Collapse in Strong-to-Weak On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13643/) (2026)
- [Rubric-based On-policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07396/) (2026)
- [STRIDE: Strategic Trajectory Reasoning via Discriminative Estimation for Verifiable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.15866/) (2026)
- [A Few Teacher Steps Go a Long Way: Cost-Efficient On-Policy Data Augmentation for Agent Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04574/) (2026)
- [CuSearch: Curriculum Rollout Sampling via Search Depth for Agentic RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11611/) (2026)
- [Persistent Negatives for Adversarial Black-Box On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30864/) (2026)
- [Revisiting On-policy Adversarial Black-Box Distillation: Calibrating Groupwise Reward Geometry for Effective Advantage Construction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39757/) (2026)
- [ActionOPD: Distilling Decisions, Not Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19820/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge distillation transfers reasoning capabilities from large teachers to efficient students. However, token-level on-policy distillation (OPD) constrains student exploration and requires teacher token probabilities, precluding distillation from black-box teachers that provide only text outputs. We introduce On-policy Verbal Distillation (OVD), a framework that uses verbal scores from black-box teachers to rank student-generated sub-trajectories, retaining high-scoring ones and replacing low-scoring ones with teacher-generated continuations. We analyze when ranking induced by verbal scores can guide distribution approximation: under a density-ratio calibration condition on acceptance probabilities and bounded teacher-replacement error, we bound the approximation error between the resulting mixed trajectory distribution and a teacher-preferred target. On Web Q&A, OVD achieves 41.09% average EM with teacher feedback at inference, exceeding the strongest evaluated baseline by 5.89 percentage points. On AMC23, OVD-FR improves accuracy over RLVR by 10.0 percentage points (52.5% to 62.5%) after 600 training steps on 128 problems. Further experiments suggest that retaining student-generated prefixes helps preserve exploration and mitigate trajectory-level entropy collapse. OVD also improves training efficiency: resampling selected suffixes rather than entire responses reduces mean per-step training time by 10.2% in the 128-problem setting. Project page: https://menik1126.github.io/ovd-project-page/.