# Bridging Functional and Representational Similarity via Usable Information

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21568 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21568/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [Searching for MobileNetV3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02244/) (2019)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.11164/) (2018)
- [Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02406/) (2015)
- [Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03368/) (2019)
- [Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08328/) (2018)
- [Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05759/) (2018)
- [Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08420/) (2021)
- [Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.5908/) (2014)
- [Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.07543/) (2015)
- [Emergence of Invariance and Disentanglement in Deep Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.01350/) (2017)
- [Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07682/) (2021)
- [Relative representations enable zero-shot latent space communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15430/) (2022)
- [Formal Limitations on the Measurement of Mutual Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.04251/) (2018)
- [A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10689/) (2020)
- [Getting aligned on representational alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13018/) (2023)
- [i-RevNet: Deep Invertible Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07088/) (2018)
- [Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14739/) (2021)
- [Multi-digit Number Recognition from Street View Imagery using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6082/) (2013)
- [Beyond accuracy: quantifying trial-by-trial behaviour of CNNs and humans by measuring error consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.16736/) (2020)
- [Stitchable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06586/) (2023)
- [Aligning Multimodal Representations through an Information Bottleneck](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04870/) (2025)
- [Model Stitching: Looking For Functional Similarity Between Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11277/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Portable Semantics, Private Dialects: Reuse and Negative Transfer in Latent Communication Between Language-Model Cells](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11365/) (2026)
- [What Makes a Latent Space Shared? Direct and Recoverable Compatibility in Motion VAEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17376/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present a unified framework for quantifying the similarity between representations through the lens of textitusable information, offering a rigorous theoretical and empirical synthesis across three key dimensions. First, addressing functional similarity, we establish a formal link between stitching performance and conditional mutual information. We further reveal that stitching is inherently asymmetric, demonstrating that robust functional comparison necessitates a bidirectional analysis rather than a unidirectional mapping. Second, concerning representational similarity, we find that reconstruction-based metrics and standard tools (e.g., CKA, RSA) act as estimators of usable information under specific constraints. Crucially, we show that similarity is relative to the capacity of the predictive family: representations that appear distinct to a rigid observer may be identical to a more expressive one. Third, we demonstrate that representational similarity is sufficient but not necessary for functional similarity. We unify these concepts through a task-granularity hierarchy: similarity on a complex task guarantees similarity on any coarser derivative, establishing representational similarity as the limit of maximum granularity: input reconstruction.
