# Toward Architecture-Aware Evaluation Metrics for LLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19583 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19583/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00352/) (2023)
- [HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17580/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00515/) (2024)
- [Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16416/) (2025)
- [Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03568/) (2024)
- [Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21504/) (2025)
- [From LLMs to LLM-based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey of Current, Challenges and Future](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.02479/) (2024)
- [Agent Design Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Architectural Patterns for Foundation Model based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10467/) (2024)
- [AI Agentic Programming: A Survey of Techniques, Challenges, and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.11126/) (2025)
- [An Empirical Study of Testing Practices in Open Source AI Agent Frameworks and Agentic Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19185/) (2025)
- [Towards Responsible Generative AI: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Model based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13148/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Inside the Scaffold: A Source-Code Taxonomy of Coding Agent Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03515/) (2026)
- [AIvilization v0: Toward Large-Scale Artificial Social Simulation with a Unified Agent Architecture and Adaptive Agent Profiles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10429/) (2026)
- [AgentCollabBench: Diagnosing When Good Agents Make Bad Collaborators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08647/) (2026)
- [AgentStripes: An Evidence-Graded Maturity Model for AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18603/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based agents are becoming central to software engineering tasks, yet evaluating them remains fragmented and largely model-centric. Existing studies overlook how architectural components, such as planners, memory, and tool routers, shape agent behavior, limiting diagnostic power. We propose a lightweight, architecture-informed approach that links agent components to their observable behaviors and to the metrics capable of evaluating them. Our method clarifies what to measure and why, and we illustrate its application through real world agents, enabling more targeted, transparent, and actionable evaluation of LLM-based agents.