# Are Video Generation Models Geographically Fair? An Attraction-Centric Evaluation of Global Visual Knowledge

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18698 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18698/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05499/) (2023)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17982/) (2023)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01717/) (2018)
- [LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00680/) (2021)
- [TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11897/) (2023)
- [EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11440/) (2023)
- [Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04894/) (2022)
- [VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21755/) (2025)
- [A Note on the Inception Score](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01973/) (2018)
- [A Survey on Video Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10647/) (2023)
- [VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15252/) (2024)
- [Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.14096/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Geographically Biased](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02680/) (2024)
- [Diffusion Beats Autoregressive in Data-Constrained Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.15857/) (2025)
- [T2VWorldBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating World Knowledge in Text-to-Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18107/) (2025)
- [A Survey of AI Text-to-Image and AI Text-to-Video Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06329/) (2023)
- [A Survey of AI-Generated Video Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19884/) (2024)
- [Towards Robust Text-Prompted Semantic Criterion for In-the-Wild Video Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14672/) (2023)
- [Optimization of Rank Losses for Image Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08250/) (2023)
- [AIGVE-Tool: AI-Generated Video Evaluation Toolkit with Multifaceted Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14064/) (2025)
- [Evaluation of Geographical Distortions in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17401/) (2024)
- [The World According to LLMs: How Geographic Origin Influences LLMs' Entity Deduction Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05525/) (2025)
- [Procrustes analysis for high-dimensional data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.04631/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in text-to-video generation have produced visually compelling results, yet it remains unclear whether these models encode geographically equitable visual knowledge. In this work, we investigate the geo-equity and geographically grounded visual knowledge of text-to-video models through an attraction-centric evaluation. We introduce Geo-Attraction Landmark Probing (GAP), a systematic framework for assessing how faithfully models synthesize tourist attractions from diverse regions, and construct GEOATTRACTION-500, a benchmark of 500 globally distributed attractions spanning varied regions and popularity levels. GAP integrates complementary metrics that disentangle overall video quality from attraction-specific knowledge, including global structural alignment, fine-grained keypoint-based alignment, and vision-language model judgments, all validated against human evaluation. Applying GAP to the state-of-the-art text-to-video model Sora 2, we find that, contrary to common assumptions of strong geographic bias, the model exhibits a relatively uniform level of geographically grounded visual knowledge across regions, development levels, and cultural groupings, with only weak dependence on attraction popularity. These results suggest that current text-to-video models express global visual knowledge more evenly than expected, highlighting both their promise for globally deployed applications and the need for continued evaluation as such systems evolve.