# Do Models Hear Like Us? Probing the Representational Alignment of Audio LLMs and Naturalistic EEG

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16540 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16540/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 79 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11477/) (2020)
- [HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07447/) (2021)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [SpeechGPT: Empowering Large Language Models with Intrinsic Cross-Modal Conversational Abilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11000/) (2023)
- [GLM-4-Voice: Towards Intelligent and Human-Like End-to-End Spoken Chatbot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02612/) (2024)
- [Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08128/) (2025)
- [Baichuan-Audio: A Unified Framework for End-to-End Speech Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17239/) (2025)
- [Self-supervised models of audio effectively explain human cortical responses to speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14252/) (2022)
- [Highly comparative time-series analysis: The empirical structure of time series and their methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1304.1209/) (2013)
- [Distinct social-linguistic processing between humans and large audio-language models: Evidence from model-brain alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19586/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Audio Large Language Models (Audio LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in integrating speech perception with language understanding. However, whether their internal representations align with human neural dynamics during naturalistic listening remains largely unexplored. In this work, we systematically examine layer-wise representational alignment between 12 open-source Audio LLMs and Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals across 2 datasets. Specifically, we employ 8 similarity metrics, such as Spearman-based Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA), to characterize within-sentence representational geometry. Our analysis reveals 3 key findings: (1) we observe a rank-dependence split, in which model rankings vary substantially across different similarity metrics; (2) we identify spatio-temporal alignment patterns characterized by depth-dependent alignment peaks and a pronounced increase in RSA within the 250-500 ms time window, consistent with N400-related neural dynamics; (3) we find an affective dissociation whereby negative prosody, identified using a proposed Tri-modal Neighborhood Consistency (TNC) criterion, reduces geometric similarity while enhancing covariance-based dependence. These findings provide new neurobiological insights into the representational mechanisms of Audio LLMs.