# Robust Fake News Detection using Large Language Models under Adversarial Sentiment Attacks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15277 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15277/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01286/) (2018)
- [Fact-Checking Complex Claims with Program-Guided Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12744/) (2023)
- [FANG: Leveraging Social Context for Fake News Detection Using Graph Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.07939/) (2020)
- [Towards LLM-based Fact Verification on News Claims with a Hierarchical Step-by-Step Prompting Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00305/) (2023)
- [Fake News in Sheep's Clothing: Robust Fake News Detection Against LLM-Empowered Style Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10830/) (2023)
- [Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15515/) (2023)
- [The Surprising Performance of Simple Baselines for Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06952/) (2021)
- [Attacking Fake News Detectors via Manipulating News Social Engagement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07363/) (2023)
- [Emotion Detection for Misinformation: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00671/) (2023)
- [Multimodal Misinformation Detection using Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14321/) (2024)
- [Fake News Detection via NLP is Vulnerable to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09657/) (2019)
- [PETGEN: Personalized Text Generation Attack on Deep Sequence Embedding-based Classification Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06777/) (2021)
- [Adversarial Style Augmentation via Large Language Model for Robust Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11260/) (2024)
- [Verifying Cross-modal Entity Consistency in News using Vision-language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11403/) (2025)
- [Improving Generalization for Multimodal Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18599/) (2023)
- [Fighting Fire with Fire: Adversarial Prompting to Generate a Misinformation Detection Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04481/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Industrialized Deception: The Collateral Effects of LLM-Generated Misinformation on Digital Ecosystems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21963/) (2026)
- [CoT is Not the Chain of Truth: An Empirical Internal Analysis of Reasoning LLMs for Fake News Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04856/) (2026)
- [Are LLMs More Skeptical of Entertainment News?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01727/) (2026)
- [ToE: A Hierarchical and Explainable Claim Verification Framework with Dynamic Multi-source Evidence Retrieval and Aggregation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.27736/) (2026)
- [Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10402/) (2026)
- [GPE: Evaluating Robust Evidence Aggregation for Fact Verification under Controllable GEO-Style Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20730/) (2026)
- [FakeSpotter: A content and strategy agnostic Viral Misinformation Detection Tool](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19152/) (2026)
- [Leveraging LLM-Generated Explanations for Detecting Emotionally Rewritten Fake News](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08835/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Misinformation and fake news have become a pressing societal challenge, driving the need for reliable automated detection methods. Prior research has highlighted sentiment as an important signal in fake news detection, either by analyzing which sentiments are associated with fake news or by using sentiment and emotion features for classification. However, this poses a vulnerability since adversaries can manipulate sentiment to evade detectors especially with the advent of large language models (LLMs). A few studies have explored adversarial samples generated by LLMs, but they mainly focus on stylistic features such as writing style of news publishers. Thus, the crucial vulnerability of sentiment manipulation remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of state-of-the-art fake news detectors under sentiment manipulation. We introduce AdSent, a sentiment-robust detection framework designed to ensure consistent veracity predictions across both original and sentiment-altered news articles. Specifically, we (1) propose controlled sentiment-based adversarial attacks using LLMs, (2) analyze the impact of sentiment shifts on detection performance. We show that changing the sentiment heavily impacts the performance of fake news detection models, indicating biases towards neutral articles being real, while non-neutral articles are often classified as fake content. (3) We introduce a novel sentiment-agnostic training strategy that enhances robustness against such perturbations. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that AdSent significantly outperforms competitive baselines in both accuracy and robustness, while also generalizing effectively to unseen datasets and adversarial scenarios.
