# Hallucination-Free Automatic Question & Answer Generation for Intuitive Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14280 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14280/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17550/) (2025)
- [A Comparative Study of AI-Generated (GPT-4) and Human-crafted MCQs in Programming Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03173/) (2023)
- [Measuring and Reducing LLM Hallucination without Gold-Standard Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10412/) (2024)
- [Automated Educational Question Generation at Different Bloom's Skill Levels using Large Language Models: Strategies and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04394/) (2024)
- [Automatic Question Generation for Intuitive Learning Utilizing Causal Graph Guided Chain of Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06098/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), defined as fluent yet incorrect or incoherent outputs, pose a significant challenge to the automatic generation of educational multiple-choice questions (MCQs). We identified four key hallucination types in MCQ generation: reasoning inconsistencies, insolvability, factual errors, and mathematical errors. To address this, we propose a hallucination-free multi-agent generation framework that breaks down MCQ generation into discrete, verifiable stages. Our framework utilizes both rule-based and LLM-based detection agents, as well as hallucination scoring metrics to optimize question quality. We redefined MCQ generation as an optimization task minimizing hallucination risk while maximizing validity, answerability, and cost-efficiency. We also introduce an agent-led refinement process that uses counterfactual reasoning and chain-of-thought (CoT) to iteratively improve hallucination in question generation. We evaluated a sample of AP- aligned STEM questions, where our system reduced hallucination rates by over 90% compared to baseline generation while preserving the educational value and style of questions. Our results demonstrate that structured multi-agent collaboration can mitigate hallucinations in educational content creation at scale, paving the way for more reliable LLM-powered learning tools.