# InT: Self-Proposed Interventions Enable Credit Assignment in LLM Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14209 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14209/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 52 of its 63 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 52)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12599/) (2025)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21187/) (2024)
- [SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18892/) (2025)
- [Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15240/) (2024)
- [Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06592/) (2024)
- [The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07301/) (2025)
- [Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03373/) (2025)
- [OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04178/) (2025)
- [Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07985/) (2024)
- [Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14945/) (2025)
- [Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08146/) (2024)
- [TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07496/) (2024)
- [HG-DAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning with Human Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02890/) (2018)
- [Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02495/) (2025)
- [VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01679/) (2024)
- [When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07266/) (2025)
- [Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18219/) (2024)
- [Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of o1-Like LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18585/) (2025)
- [Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Meta Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07572/) (2025)
- [Process Reward Models That Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16828/) (2025)
- [Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00127/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [POPE: Learning to Reason on Hard Problems via Privileged On-Policy Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18779/) (2026)
- [From Reasoning to Agentic: Credit Assignment in Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09459/) (2026)
- [Reasoning Cache: Continual Improvement Over Long Horizons via Short-Horizon RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03773/) (2026)
- [SkillFlow: Flow-Driven Recursive Skill Evolution for Agentic Orchestration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14089/) (2026)
- [Credit Assignment with Resets in Language Model Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25507/) (2026)
- [From Reasoning Chains to Verifiable Subproblems: Curriculum Reinforcement Learning Enables Credit Assignment for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22074/) (2026)
- [Self-Trained Verification for Training- and Test-Time Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30290/) (2026)
- [Making Expert Reasoning Learnable with Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02405/) (2026)
- [Seirenes: Adversarial Self-Play with Evolving Distractions for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11636/) (2026)
- [EDIT: Evidence-Diagnosed Intervention Training for Rule-Faithful LLM Grading](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06350/) (2026)
- [When Implausible Tokens Get Reinforced: Tail-Aware Credit Calibration for LLM Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07976/) (2026)
- [Shattering the Autoregressive Curse: Dynamic Epistemic Entropy Orchestrated Erasable Reinforcement Learning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.17735/) (2026)
- [What Process Evaluation of Coding Agents Actually Measures: Action, Task, and Step Are Three Different Levels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22960/) (2026)
- [MInTRL: Off-policy Intervention can boost On-policy RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12419/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Outcome-reward reinforcement learning (RL) has proven effective at improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, standard RL assigns credit only at the level of the final answer, penalizing entire reasoning traces when the outcome is incorrect and uniformly reinforcing all steps when it is correct. As a result, correct intermediate steps may be discouraged in failed traces, while spurious steps may be reinforced in successful ones. We refer to this failure mode as the problem of credit assignment. While a natural remedy is to train a process reward model, accurately optimizing such models to identify corrective reasoning steps remains challenging. We introduce Intervention Training (InT), a training paradigm in which the model performs fine-grained credit assignment on its own reasoning traces by proposing short, targeted corrections that steer trajectories toward higher reward. Using reference solutions commonly available in mathematical reasoning datasets and exploiting the fact that verifying a model-generated solution is easier than generating a correct one from scratch, the model identifies the first error in its reasoning and proposes a single-step intervention to redirect the trajectory toward the correct solution. We then apply supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to the on-policy rollout up to the point of error concatenated with the intervention, localizing error to the specific step that caused failure. We show that the resulting model serves as a far better initialization for RL training. After running InT and subsequent fine-tuning with RL, we improve accuracy by nearly 14% over a 4B-parameter base model on IMO-AnswerBench, outperforming larger open-source models such as gpt-oss-20b.