# CauScientist: Teaching LLMs to Respect Data for Causal Discovery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13614 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13614/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01422/) (2018)
- [Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1302.4983/) (2013)
- [Amortized Inference for Causal Structure Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12934/) (2022)
- [Efficient Neural Causal Discovery without Acyclicity Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10483/) (2021)
- [Causal Discovery with Language Models as Imperfect Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02390/) (2023)
- [Integrating Large Language Model for Improved Causal Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16902/) (2023)
- [Causal Order: The Key to Leveraging Imperfect Experts in Causal Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15117/) (2023)
- [Integrating Large Language Models in Causal Discovery: A Statistical Causal Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01454/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [CauTion: Knowing When to Trust LLMs for Ensemble Causal Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03602/) (2026)
- [ABSOL: Aggregated Bayesian Subsampling Orchestrated with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15007/) (2026)
- [Overcoming Challenges of Interpretive Structural Modeling with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02254/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Causal discovery is fundamental to scientific understanding and reliable decision-making. Existing approaches face critical limitations: purely data-driven methods suffer from statistical indistinguishability and modeling assumptions, while recent LLM-based methods either ignore statistical evidence or incorporate unverified priors that can mislead result. To this end, we propose CauScientist, a collaborative framework that synergizes LLMs as hypothesis-generating "data scientists" with probabilistic statistics as rigorous "verifiers". CauScientist employs hybrid initialization to select superior starting graphs, iteratively refines structures through LLM-proposed modifications validated by statistical criteria, and maintains error memory to guide efficient search space. Experiments demonstrate that CauScientist substantially outperforms purely data-driven baselines, achieving up to 53.8% F1 score improvement and enhancing recall from 35.0% to 100.0%. Notably, while standalone LLM performance degrades with graph complexity, CauScientist reduces structural hamming distance (SHD) by 44.0% compared to Qwen3-32B on 37-node graphs. Our project page is at https://github.com/OpenCausaLab/CauScientist.
