# Reasoning is a Modality

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13562 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13562/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 10 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Hierarchical Reasoning Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21734/) (2025)
- [On the Measure of Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.01547/) (2019)
- [The Surprising Effectiveness of Test-Time Training for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07279/) (2024)
- [Less is More: Recursive Reasoning with Tiny Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04871/) (2025)
- [Addressing the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus via Procedural Example Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07353/) (2024)
- [H-ARC: A Robust Estimate of Human Performance on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01374/) (2024)
- [ARC Is a Vision Problem!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14761/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) provides a compact laboratory for studying abstract reasoning, an ability central to human intelligence. Modern AI systems, including LLMs and ViTs, largely operate as sequence-of-behavior prediction machines: they match observable behaviors by modeling token statistics without a persistent, readable mental state. This creates a gap with human-like behavior: humans can explain an action by decoding internal state, while AI systems can produce fluent post-hoc rationalizations that are not grounded in such a state. We hypothesize that reasoning is a modality: reasoning should exist as a distinct channel separate from the low-level workspace on which rules are applied. To test this hypothesis, on solving ARC tasks as a visual reasoning problem, we designed a novel role-separated transformer block that splits global controller tokens from grid workspace tokens, enabling iterative rule execution. Trained and evaluated within the VARC vision-centric protocol, our method achieved 62.6% accuracy on ARC-1, surpassing average human performance (60.2%) and outperforming prior methods significantly. Qualitatively, our models exhibit more coherent rule-application structure than the dense ViT baseline, consistent with a shift away from plausible probability blobs toward controller-driven reasoning.